Dave Landau has written to the IPKat, informing him that the Patent Office is undertaking a review of the Copyright Tribunal. The following appears on the Patent Office website:
Review of the Copyright Tribunal
The Patent Office is considering whether improvements could be made in the way in which the Copyright Tribunal works. The effecting of improvements may involve amendment to the Copyright Tribunal Rules 1989 (as amended), consolidation of the statutory instruments governing the workings of the Tribunal, revision of the 1995 Practice Direction (as amended) and changes to the general administration of the Tribunal by the Patent Office.
More information about the Tribunal is available on this website.
The Patent Office would welcome any thoughts you have as to how the workings of the Tribunal might be improved. We are also interested in your views on the rules under which the Tribunal operates.
All comments should be received by 31 May 2006.
If you wish to make any comments please address them to:
Mr C J Bowen
The Patent OfficeRoom
2B.46Concept House
Cardiff Road
Newport
South Wales
NP10 8QQ
E-mail: chris.bowen@patent.gov.uk
Fax: + 44 (0)1633 814122
REVIEW OF THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL
![REVIEW OF THE COPYRIGHT TRIBUNAL]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Friday, March 10, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html