EU alters GI rules (but just a little bit)Businessweek reports that EU agricultural ministers have OK’d changes to the geographical indications rules. The changes are in response to last year’s WTO ruling that the EU was not in compliance with international law in this area by discriminating against non-EU producers. The EU has now removed the requirement that non-EU countries must operate a similar system in order to benefit from European GI protection.
GIs from other countries (left) - now welcome in the EU
The IPKat can see the sense in this. If GIs deserve protection, they deserve protection wherever they originate.
Judge Fysh at QMIPRI
Next Monday at 5.30pm, Judge Fysh is speaking at QMIPRI (the Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, London) on ‘Consenting to Parallel Imports – is Economic Linkage the Correct Test?’
As ever, all are welcome and it’s free, but please RSVP to Ilanah
GIs AND PARALLEL IMPORTS
![GIs AND PARALLEL IMPORTS]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html