JIPLP strikes again
The electronic version of the March 2006 issue of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice has been available online for a month or so - but let's not forget that you can read it on paper too. There are some great features this time around. How about these for starters:
* Simon Stokes (a partner in London law firm Tarlo Lyons) reviews the mismatch between artistic copyright rules and current conceptions as to what constitutes art;IPKat co-blogmeister Jeremy is always interested in receiving bright and exciting new ideas for articles and other features in JIPLP. He's also happy to hear from prospective authors - but remember, all published content is peer-reviewed ... If you want to make any suggestions to him, you can email him here. For free sample issue, click here. For subscription details, click here.
* Leading solicitor-turned-barrister Anna Carboni (left, now of Wilberforce Chambers) dissects the interface between Community trade mark and Community design law and elucidates the ways in which overlap can be exploited;
* International scholar Lior Zemer (Universities of Boston and Leicester, soon to be teaching IP at University College London) takes a critical view of the laws governing authorship and ownership of collaborative works in US and UK law, offering some suggestions for reform;
* TRIPs guru Daniel Gervais (University of Ottawa, right) describes and explains the current and likely future shifts of law and policy in terms of global IP policy - and shows how relevant it is to IP businesses worldwide;
* Maria Isabel Manley and Anna Wray (Bristows, London) give vent to some powerful criticisms of the position taken by the European Commission against AstraZeneca on the legitimacy of withdrawing pharmaceutical product authorisations.
JIPLP STRIKES AGAIN!
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Sunday, March 12, 2006
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html