Man and Superman

The IPKat has learnt of an interesting decision from the OHIM Second Board.

DC Comics applied to register SUPERMAN as a word mark (CTM) for lots of goods and services. This was opposed by the proprietor of the German MAN stylised word mark for a number of identical and similar goods or services.

The Opposition Division rejected the opposition and the OHIM Second Board agreed.

The fatal fact for the owner of the MAN mark was that it was just not similar enough to the SUPERMAN mark for any of the relative grounds to stick. Although there was some visual and phonetic similarity due to the presence of MAN in both marks, the conceptual meaning of SUPERMAN as the famous superhero meant that conceptually the two marks were very different. In reaching this conclusion, the Board took ‘judicial’ notice of the fame of Superman, the comic book hero and also noted that, while usually SUPER would be discounted as descriptive and non-distinctive, here it turned an ordinary word into something with a strong conceptual meaning.

The strength of the conceptual element of the mark and its distance from the term MAN meant there was no likelihood of confusion. It also put pay to an Art.8(4) claim since, according to OHIM, there are no national laws which do no require similarity of marks. The distance between the two marks also meant that consumers would not make the link between them required for Art.8(5).

The IPKat reckons that this is a common-sense decision. He’s a bit worried though. Were it not for the fame of SUPERMAN, would the proprietors of the MAN mark have been able to stop the registration of any mark containing an element as basic as ‘man’?
Man and Superman Man and Superman Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, July 23, 2007 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. It's a no brainer Ilanah. You'd have to be mad to come to any other view.

    I bet DC Comics filed a shed load of evidence to substantiate the reputation of Superman (to quote the decision - "worldwide symbol of truth and justice" (para 7)). All to no avail as the OHIM took judicial notice of reputation in any event. Never mind, I bet they're still reading the comics at OHIM !


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.