UK-IPO recruitment/IPKat competition

The UK Intellectual Property Office is advertising some vacancies for trade mark examiners.

Right: an examiner (from Mostly Banal, which a cynic would doubtless describe as part of the job description)

According to the job specification, the skills and attributes required are:

* Well developed analytical ability; to analyse general guidance, to understand and interpret complex legislation, associated rules, case law and practice and apply it to individual cases.

* Strong written and oral communication skills; the ability to communicate effectively with staff, senior colleagues and user interests in a variety of forms (written, face to face, telephone).

* Customer orientated approach; in dealing with professional practitioners and unrepresented applicants

Left: an applicant demonstrates her "customer-oriented approach"

* Ability to organise and prioritise workload;

* A good team player.

Right: "a good team player"-- down in Newport each trainee examiner is taught how to commit a "professional foul"

The IPKat knows better, so he's running a competition. Readers are invited to submit, by close of play on 31 August 2007 (that's midnight, British Summer Time), the five criteria that a successful trade mark examiner really needs. just email the IPKat here with your answers. As usual, the winning entries will be posted on this weblog. The prize is complimentary admission and a FREE LUNCH at the CLT Intellectual Property in the Fashion Industry conference on 20 September (see here for full programme details). This competition is open to trade mark examiners who are currently employed at UK-IPO but, if they prefer anonymity, they are advised to type the word "insider" on the title line of their entries so that their names will not be accidentally revealed.
UK-IPO recruitment/IPKat competition UK-IPO recruitment/IPKat competition Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.