Don't spill alcohol on your radio.
The reason for the change of name from Virgin Radio to Absolute Radio was the sale of the business to the Times of India for £53.2 million in June, where the ownership of the Virgin mark was retained by Richard Branson and the new proprietors announced the re-branding as Absolute Radio (as part of its new management company, Absolute Radio International). (At right: the Absolute Radio public blog, absolutely no help at all).
V&S Vin & Spirit, the proprietor of Absolut (the trade mark of Swedish vodka) has commenced proceedings against the rebranded Virgin Radio, Absolute Radio.
As well as the vodka trade mark V&S owns the Absolut Tracks music project, and claims Virgin Radio is infringing its trade mark and passing its services off as those of V&S. A spokeswoman for V&S stated, "The reason for this is that we consider there is a risk of confusion. We have a well known brand and there is an obvious risk of confusion between Absolut vodka and Absolute Radio. We have filed a complaint and now we go into the legal process."
The reason for the change of name from Virgin Radio to Absolute Radio was the sale of the business to the Times of India for £53.2 million in June, where the ownership of the Virgin mark was retained by Richard Branson and the new proprietors announced the re-branding as Absolute Radio (as part of its new management company, Absolute Radio International). (At right: the Absolute Radio public blog, absolutely no help at all).
Can listeners tell the difference between a vodka brand and a radio brand? Merpel suggests it depends on how much vodka.
Absolute Power
Reviewed by Johanna Gibson
on
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html