Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / Ministerial vacancy / Vacancy

Vacancy

- ,
The IPKat has just learned that Baroness Morgan, Minister for Intellectual Property and other Minor Things in the UK government, has moved to the Department for Children, Schools and Families. He wishes her the very best of luck in her new role and is sure that she will make the greatest impact where her talents are best deployed -- as indeed Lord Triesman has done on being moved from Intellectual Property to the Football Association. According to the website of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills, "Further information about the new ministers and their ministerial responsibilities will be announced later this week".

The IPKat welcomes nominations from suitably qualified candidates [which, suspects Merpel, may be more than can currently be said for the Prime Minister].
Vacancy Vacancy Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, October 06, 2008 Rating: 5

6 comments:

  1. AnonymousMonday, 6 October 2008 at 13:34:00 GMT+1

    I'm not sure if you're having a dig at Lord Triesman ot not, but I think that by all accounts he did get a handle on ip issues during his short tenure

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousMonday, 6 October 2008 at 17:56:00 GMT+1

    There's an error in your article, Kat(s). The baroness has gone but the vacancy remains.

    If the economy is so important that an expert, peter mandelson has to be broguht back to look after it, why is intellectgual property so unimportant that only people who have nothing to do with it are put in charge?

    ReplyDelete
  3. David PearceMonday, 6 October 2008 at 18:53:00 GMT+1

    Two words: deckchairs; Titanic.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousTuesday, 7 October 2008 at 13:26:00 GMT+1

    Yes, yes, but is there any news of the iceberg?

    Seriously, would you put an arts graduate in charge of the Jet Propulsion Lab or a science graduate in charge of the London Philharmonic?

    It is somewhat tiresome that government does not seem to take IP seriously enough to employ someone who is duly qualified and has a proven track record in this area of endeavour. Even if they are in good faith and try to learn as much as possible while in office, time (and consequently money) is lost. It also means that a person not trained for the task in question is more likely to leave at short notice, creating continuity problems in government policy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousTuesday, 7 October 2008 at 19:00:00 GMT+1

    IP has gone up in the world. It now has a Minister of State (rather than a mere Parliamentary Under Secretary of State). The new minister is David Lammy MP.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousThursday, 9 October 2008 at 17:34:00 GMT+1

    Interesting that they seem to having the same discussion accros the atlantic.

    From: http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp

    ...time for me to start compiling names of those who I think are qualified to be the next Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, otherwise known as the Director of the Patent & Trademark Office. ...my hope is that we can get someone who actually knows a thing or two about patents...

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.