Some correspondents have been wondering why the IPKat hasn't been able to provide more, and better, coverage of the progress towards the European Union's proposed Unified Patent Court and the Unitary Patent System. Well, you try it! As soon as you start reading one document, along comes another one!
Less than two weeks ago, along came the Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text (Brussels, 19 October 2011). This draft is 99 sides long: "Changes in relation to the previous version are marked. The provisions in italics marked with square brackets are still being developed as their final version depends either on the drafting technique to be adopted or on the content of the planned Commission proposal on changes to the acquis itself". However, one week later along came Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute -- Revised Presidency text (Brussels, 26 October 2011). According to this document, also 99 sides long, "Delegations will find in the Annex a revised Presidency compromise text concerning the above draft agreement, to serve as the basis for discussions at the meeting of the Friends of the Presidency Group on 27 October 2011. Changes in relation to the previous version (15539/11) are underlined".
But while the Unified Court has been taking shape, the Unitary Patent has also been inching towards its completion. This document, also dated 26 October, contains (i) the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection -- Preparation of the next informal trialogue and (ii) the Proposal for a Regulation of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements -- Preparation of the next exchange of views with the European Parliament. This 87-page document promises that, "Following the meeting on 18 October, delegations will find in the Annexes comparative tables concerning the two above-mentioned proposed Regulations for examination at the meeting of the Friends of the Presidency Group on 27 October 2011 in preparation of the forthcoming informal trialogue, scheduled for 8 November 2011".
The IPKat wonders whether it is he alone who is struggling to keep up with all the latest documentation, digest and understand it and then make any sort of sensible comments on it before the next batch of documentation comes winging its way towards him. Merpel agrees and ponders on whether flooding interested parties with information as just as effective a way of silencing them as giving them no information in the first place.
The IPKat thanks Professor Steve Peers, University of Essex, for supplying him with so much to read!
Less than two weeks ago, along came the Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute - Revised Presidency text (Brussels, 19 October 2011). This draft is 99 sides long: "Changes in relation to the previous version are marked. The provisions in italics marked with square brackets are still being developed as their final version depends either on the drafting technique to be adopted or on the content of the planned Commission proposal on changes to the acquis itself". However, one week later along came Draft agreement on a Unified Patent Court and draft Statute -- Revised Presidency text (Brussels, 26 October 2011). According to this document, also 99 sides long, "Delegations will find in the Annex a revised Presidency compromise text concerning the above draft agreement, to serve as the basis for discussions at the meeting of the Friends of the Presidency Group on 27 October 2011. Changes in relation to the previous version (15539/11) are underlined".
But while the Unified Court has been taking shape, the Unitary Patent has also been inching towards its completion. This document, also dated 26 October, contains (i) the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection -- Preparation of the next informal trialogue and (ii) the Proposal for a Regulation of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements -- Preparation of the next exchange of views with the European Parliament. This 87-page document promises that, "Following the meeting on 18 October, delegations will find in the Annexes comparative tables concerning the two above-mentioned proposed Regulations for examination at the meeting of the Friends of the Presidency Group on 27 October 2011 in preparation of the forthcoming informal trialogue, scheduled for 8 November 2011".
The IPKat wonders whether it is he alone who is struggling to keep up with all the latest documentation, digest and understand it and then make any sort of sensible comments on it before the next batch of documentation comes winging its way towards him. Merpel agrees and ponders on whether flooding interested parties with information as just as effective a way of silencing them as giving them no information in the first place.
The IPKat thanks Professor Steve Peers, University of Essex, for supplying him with so much to read!
European patent reform: so much to read!
![European patent reform: so much to read!]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, October 31, 2011
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html