Baroness appoints Duke to protect Royalty and other IP interests in China

"Not another telling-off from the IPKat!", mewed the Men
from the Ministry -- but this time they were in for some
well-earned and unexpected praise ...
While the IPKat and Merpel regard it as their public duty to criticise the UK government for its shortcomings, misperceptions and erroneous assumptions concerning intellectual property, they do so with a certain degree of sadness.  Governments that change their policies and their personnel every few years are actually quite like excitable and eager-to-please children who never grow up, and the IPKat team -- acting in loco parentis as it were -- must chide them, give them a telling-off where necessary, while all the time reminding them that they have the government's best interests and the welfare of the nation at heart.  This makes it all the more exciting to be able to pat the government on the head from time to time and say, "well done, you've got it right".

Something which the UK government does seem to have got right can be found in today's media release from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, "New Intellectual Property Attaché in China will support UK businesses".  This reads in relevant part as follows:
"The UK’s first ever Intellectual Property (IP) Attaché has been appointed and will start work in China on 14 December [Goodness, that's soon, says the IPKat. What a shame the government's other recent good idea, the Patents County Court's small claims track, can't be put into operation so quickly ...]. The position is an important part of the Government’s plans to strengthen trade relations and unlock the growth potential of UK businesses abroad.

Tom Duke is the former head the IP Centre at the European Union Chamber of Commerce in South Korea [with the amazing acronym "EUCCK"]. He will be based at the British Embassy in Beijing and will be working alongside UKTI and British businesses operating in China to provide support and advice on industry concerns about the enforcement of IP rights.

Minister for Intellectual Property Baroness Wilcox announced the appointment at the first UK-China Symposium held in London today. Baroness Wilcox said:
“... By appointing our first IP Attaché in Beijing it will provide a physical presence for British businesses and help to build relations with intellectual property agencies in China. We need an efficient global intellectual property system [not so easy, says Merpel, when you see how long it has taken us to develop an inefficient, non-global one] where businesses have the confidence to trade in growing markets. I’m delighted that we have been able to agree to share information and ensure that intellectual property rights both here and in China are enforced robustly”.
Tom Duke said:
“This is a fantastic chance to work closely with UK businesses and build on our already strong links in China. I am looking forward to playing an important role in addressing the intellectual property protection and enforcement issues that have been raised by UK companies"".
This Kat recalls that, speaking at this Spring's Fordham IP Conference in New York, the US Intellectual Property Enforcement Commissioner Victoria Espinel said that her office was committed to doing much the same thing, and that the impression he received was that this made US businesses, particularly those not large and strong enough to look after themselves, more confident about all aspects of trade with China, the non-contentious as well as the other sort.  He hopes that the benefits of this exercise will be quantified and that, in result, more resources will be made available to support Tom in this important work.
Baroness appoints Duke to protect Royalty and other IP interests in China Baroness appoints Duke to protect Royalty and other IP interests in China Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, December 08, 2011 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.