ACTA - now the EU Parliament's petitions committee will have a look

ACTA in the news again (see earlier ACTA related IPKat posts here) and things are still confusing.

By way of reminder: so far 22 EU member states have signed up to ACTA, but several others, especially in Eastern Europe and as well as Germany, have decided against doing so.

Today the EU Parliament received a petition signed by more than 2.4 million Internet users against ACTA. This did not come unexpectedly as the EU Parliament already announced on its website, yesterday that
"The EP's [European Parliament's] petitions committee will look at the petition before deciding what action to take."
The chair of the EP's petitions committee, Erminia Mazzoniis, was quoted as follows:
"The ratification procedure of ACTA in the European Parliament has only just started. It will need to be examined carefully, taking into consideration all concerns, through a reasoned assessment of the facts and trying to combine the freedom of the Internet on the one hand and the fight against counterfeiting on the other. The follow-up of the petition will be decided in the coming weeks by the members of the committee on petitions."
....and indeed, the petition was delivered today and news site Euronews cites David Martin, a Scottish S&D member, who has recently been named the EP's ACTA rapporteur after his predecessor controversially resigned, as follows:
“I think ACTA, or something like ACTA, is necessary to defend our copyright holders and intellectual property holders but not at the price of criminalising ordinary citizens for simply downloading music or films or whatever from the internet. So I do not want any infringement on their civil liberties to do such things...”
The website The Parliament further quotes Mr Martin as having said that a "lack of transparency" during the drafting stages had "undermined" public confidence in the agreement:
"I want to analyse, consult and have a debate on the [ACTA] agreement and have not yet come to a conclusion on it."
Interesting times ahead....
ACTA - now the EU Parliament's petitions committee will have a look ACTA - now the EU Parliament's petitions committee will have a look Reviewed by Birgit Clark on Tuesday, February 28, 2012 Rating: 5


  1. I am utterly astonished to read that there appears to have been a "lack of transparency during the drafting stages of ACTA". That sort of thing might happen in dictatorships, but surly not in enlightened modern democracies!

  2. nie To nie cenzura internetu. Zastanów się, zanim zaatakujesz ACTA jak stwierdził De Gucht w UE, bo to kompletna utrata wszelkiej twojej wolności...

  3. Of course there was no transparancy in the drafting stage of ACTA. There wasn't supposed to be. The decisive phases of international negotiations, also at WIPO, are always behind closed doors, because compromises cannot be reached with lobbyists looking on. That's why the making of international agreements is a government prerogative. Democracy comes in when the result is to be implemented, i.e., as far as ACTA is concerned, now .


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.