ACTA in the news again (see earlier ACTA related IPKat posts here) and things are still confusing. By way of reminder: so far 22 EU member states have signed up to ACTA, but several others, especially in Eastern Europe and as well as Germany, have decided against doing so.
Today the EU Parliament received a petition signed by more than 2.4 million Internet users against ACTA. This did not come unexpectedly as the EU Parliament already announced on its website, yesterday that
"The EP's [European Parliament's] petitions committee will look at the petition before deciding what action to take."The chair of the EP's petitions committee, Erminia Mazzoniis, was quoted as follows:
"The ratification procedure of ACTA in the European Parliament has only just started. It will need to be examined carefully, taking into consideration all concerns, through a reasoned assessment of the facts and trying to combine the freedom of the Internet on the one hand and the fight against counterfeiting on the other. The follow-up of the petition will be decided in the coming weeks by the members of the committee on petitions."....and indeed, the petition was delivered today and news site Euronews cites David Martin, a Scottish S&D member, who has recently been named the EP's ACTA rapporteur after his predecessor controversially resigned, as follows:
“I think ACTA, or something like ACTA, is necessary to defend our copyright holders and intellectual property holders but not at the price of criminalising ordinary citizens for simply downloading music or films or whatever from the internet. So I do not want any infringement on their civil liberties to do such things...”The website The Parliament further quotes Mr Martin as having said that a "lack of transparency" during the drafting stages had "undermined" public confidence in the agreement:
"I want to analyse, consult and have a debate on the [ACTA] agreement and have not yet come to a conclusion on it."Interesting times ahead....
ACTA - now the EU Parliament's petitions committee will have a look
Reviewed by Birgit Clark
on
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Rating:
Reviewed by Birgit Clark
on
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
I am utterly astonished to read that there appears to have been a "lack of transparency during the drafting stages of ACTA". That sort of thing might happen in dictatorships, but surly not in enlightened modern democracies!
ReplyDeletenie To nie cenzura internetu. Zastanów się, zanim zaatakujesz ACTA jak stwierdził De Gucht w UE, bo to kompletna utrata wszelkiej twojej wolności...
ReplyDeleteOf course there was no transparancy in the drafting stage of ACTA. There wasn't supposed to be. The decisive phases of international negotiations, also at WIPO, are always behind closed doors, because compromises cannot be reached with lobbyists looking on. That's why the making of international agreements is a government prerogative. Democracy comes in when the result is to be implemented, i.e., as far as ACTA is concerned, now .
ReplyDelete