More hacked off? Mulcaire given leave to appeal

If mobile phones could talk,
all this could be avoided,
says Merpel
This Kat was snuggled up yesterday afternoon with his noise-cancelling headphones listening to Baroness Wilcox and her team give evidence to the House of Lords Committee about the Unitary Patent, as reported by the Amerikat here.  While he was so absorbed, a number of feline friends including Cat the Kat kindly drew his attention to reports (here, here and here) that Glenn Mulcaire has been given leave to appeal to the Supreme Court from the Decision (reported by the IPKat here) of the Court of Appeal that he is not entitled to claim privilege from self-incrimination in relation to phone hacking, because of the operation of s72 of the Senior Courts Act.  There will apparently be a 2–day hearing on 9 May.

The IPKat is breathless with excitement that this rather obscure provision of the Senior Courts Act will get such a thorough judicial consideration.  He looks forward to reporting the outcome.  Merpel wonders whether a Senior Courts Act needs Senior judges to understand it.
More hacked off? Mulcaire given leave to appeal More hacked off?  Mulcaire given leave to appeal Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, February 16, 2012 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.