Litigating IP in the General Court: can anyone help?

Counsel are required to attend
the General Court properly attired
Last week, in the Official Journal of the European Union no. L68 of 7 March 2012, a document was published under the title "Practice directions to parties before the General Court". For the benefit of strangers to intellectual property litigation in Europe, the General Court is the junior part of the Court of Justice of the European Union. It hears appeals from Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in relation to Community trade marks and registered Community designs. In addition, the General Court is the forum in which actions are brought when a party challenges a decision of the European Commission -- for example where the Commission investigates a complaint based on the abuse of a monopoly or distortion of the market -- and it is the tribunal before which actions for infringement of IP rights may be brought against the organs of the European Union themselves.

The Practice Directions published last week make a total of 17 references to intellectual property.  This Kat could simply cut and paste them here but, since he has never been involved in any General Court litigation and doesn't know how these Directions differ in their effect -- if indeed they do -- from their predecessors, he would really like to hear from some of his readers who practise before that court. Can they tell readers about the impact that the Directions are likely to have on the way IP disputes are litigated in terms of speed, cost, efficiency and, equally importantly, the ability of the court to deliver the right result?

Update, 13 March, 11.37am: a katpat to Simon Malynicz (3 New Square), who has emailed the Kat as follows:

"The main point to note is the new e-Curia service, which allows documents to be lodged in Luxembourg electronically without the need to provide them by post or courier. Previously this was possible by email or fax, provided the requisite number of certified hard copies arrived by courier or post within 10 days.
Details of how to use the e-Curia service are not set out in that Practice Direction, however, but are to be found in the separate e-Curia user manual, available at >General Court >Procedure. In summary, it is a free service available to lawyers (sorry, not trade mark or patent attorneys, even with rights of audience) that one opens by filling in a form on the Curia website. Documents are transmitted in PDF format. The Court then serves the other parties pleadings and responses using e-Curia also".
Litigating IP in the General Court: can anyone help? Litigating IP in the General Court: can anyone help? Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.