EU Parliament adopts Collective Rights Management Directive

Gino celebrating
further progress made
towards final adoption
of the directive
There are just a few topics in the realm of copyright (well, for sure one is technological protection measures) that this Kat finds more exciting than collective rights management. 

This is why she is particularly happy to report on progress made towards the final adoption of a new EU directive "on collective management of copyright related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses in the internal market" [background katposts here and here]

As IP Watch and 1709 Blog's Ben reported, 2 days ago (4 February) the European Parliament adopted a directive which, according to EU Commissioner and Katfriend Michel Barnier, "is a cornerstone of the digital single market", in that it "will facilitate the entry of smaller innovative suppliers on the European market", and "will also contribute to wider availability and better choice of offers of online music in Europe."

As IPKat readers will remember, this initiative draws upon the 2011 blueprint for intellectual property rights to boost creativity and innovation, in which the Commission highlighted that "[w]hile the substantive scope of copyright has been largely harmonised, rights are still licensed on a national basis. In view of the digital Single Market, streamlining copyright licensing and revenue distribution is one of the most important challenges that must be addressed."

Readers will also remember the criticisms to the proposal, as expressed by the Max Planck Institute [here]. In particular, these focused on Commission's sectorial approach to the regulation of cross-border licensing and the fact that the proposed directive did not distinguish between different categories of rightsholders. The Max Planck Institute also advised European legislature to clearly state that the intellectual property exception of article 17(11) of the Service Directive applies to collecting societies, on consideration that collecting societies manage copyrights and related rights arising from national law.

As explained in a surprisingly detailed press release, the main reasons for adopting this new directive can be summarised as follows:
  • The functioning of some collective management organisations has raised concerns as to their transparency, governance and the handling of revenues collected on behalf of right-holders. 
  • The collective management of rights is also important for the licensing of online service providers (music download services, streaming services). 
  • Online service providers often want to cover a multitude of territories and a large catalogue of music, while many collective management organisations today are not ready for this. 
  • Besides issues of incorrect or missing invoicing, all this has resulted in fewer music services being available to consumers across the EU, along with a slower uptake of innovative services and poor allocation of revenue to rightholders.
Andrius will be finally able
to choose who
should take care of his repertoire
(and his collection of leather jackets)
Thus, this new directive intends to:
  1. Improve the way all collective management organisations are managed by establishing common governance, transparency and financial management standards.
  2. Set common standards for the multi-territorial licensing by authors' collective management organisations of rights in musical works for the provision of online services [readers, especially those who have taken the trouble to respond to the Consultation (here) on the review of EU copyright rules - whose deadline has been extended to 5th March -, will be well aware that one of the issues dealt with therein is indeed cross-border provision of, and access to, services].
  3. Allow "a Lithuanian singer to choose what collective management organisation he want to hand over his repertoire", as Rapporteur Marielle Gallo exemplified:
  4. Require collective management organisations to open up for alternative licences, including open licences such as Creative Commons, and
  5. Create conditions that can expand the legal offer of online music.

Once the Council has formally adopted the new legislation, the new rules will enter into force on the twentieth day following that of the publication of the directive in Merpel's favourite magazine, ie the Official Journal of the European Union
EU Parliament adopts Collective Rights Management Directive EU Parliament adopts Collective Rights Management Directive Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, February 06, 2014 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. The Max Planck Institute also advised European legislature to clearly state that the intellectual property exception of article 17(11) of the Service Directive applies to collecting societies, on consideration that collecting societies manage copyrights and related rights arising from national law.
    online reputation


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.