His Account is Not Likely Overdrawn |
One of the defendants in the ‘Coinye West’ trademark infringement
suit entered into a consent agreement with Kanye West and his company Mascotte
Holdings (Plaintiffs) over the Coinye West crypto-currency. Judge Analisa
Torres from the Southern District of New York issued the permanent injunction.
Defendants had launched a crypto-currency, the COINYE WEST,
or COINYE, or COYE on the <coinyewest.com> website in December 2013. They
redirected the site to <coinyewest.in> after receiving a cease and desist
letter from Kanye West’s attorneys. In spite of the letter, their crypto-currency
launched in January 2014.
Bitcoin was the first crypto currency to emerge in 2009 and
has since been the source of inspiration for many more. As stated in the Plaintiffs’
amended complaint, “[t]here are over 150 new digital currencies attempting
to compete with Bitcoin, some in earnest and some as marketing ploys.” A
crypto-currency is created (‘mined’) by individuals using open-source software
and computers to solve complex math problems. If they solve a math problem,
they are rewarded in coins (I will have to find another way to become a millionaire!).The amended complaint explains in detail how such a system works.
Kanye West needs no introduction, but let me refresh your
memory. As stated in the amended complaint, “Mr. West is credited with refocusing rap from hardcore gangster themes
to more personal messages,” and “Mr. West
sets trends for everything he touches.” He is also a member, with Kim
Kardashian, of the #WorldsMostTalkedAboutCouple, aka Kimye, which is (not yet?)
a trademark.
However, Mascotte Holdings, Inc. owns several KANYE WEST
trademarks, such as KANYE WEST in class 41 for music composition and KANYE WEST
in class 25 for clothing. Kanye West is quite adept at self-promoting his personal
brand, and can boast 10.6 million followers on Twitter, and an April 2014 U.S.
Vogue Cover with wife Kim, which has been spoofed many times.
But the Kanye West brand is no joke and the artist is a savvy
businessman who indeed seems to have a Midas touch, changing everything he
touches into gold. It is not surprising that he would be chosen to adorn the
face of a new currency. The first version of the COINYE represented a golden cartoon
version of the famous singer, complete with ‘shutter shades sunglasses, and then
was changed to represent a cartoon version of Kanye West as a fish.The fish
had shutter shades as well.
Alas! Neither the use of Kanye West’s name nor his likeness had
been authorized and Plaintiffs had issued a complaint last January. They amended
it in March, claiming trademark infringement, trademark dilution, unfair
competition and cyber squatting. The complaint mentioned several cases of
consumer confusion on Twitter, such as this one or this one. They also claimed
that Kanye West’s right of privacy and publicity had been violated under New
York Civil Rights Law §50 and §51. This law was also recently the basis for
Lindsay Lohan's suit against the makers of the Grand Theft Auto Video Game. It provides a cause of
action if the identity of the plaintiff has been used in advertising or
commerce without written consent.
The defendant is permanently enjoined from registering or
operating a website using the KANYE WEST mark, the COINYE West mark, the COYE
mark or any “colorable imitation” of these marks, to use the mark KANYE WEST,
to use Kanye West’s likeness in any
manner likely to cause confusion tor to deceive the public. However, this site is still claiming to offer coinye coins and is using the cartoon of Kanye West
as a fish. It states in its FAQs that “the
guys who started Coinye are nowhere to be found, but we gladly take it from
here” and that “The Original
Developers ran off from the lawyers. However, the coin was already unstoppable
out, so the community decided to take over and work on it for further
development (sic).” Will there also be further legal developments?
Kanye West Ain’t No (Crypto) Banker
Reviewed by Marie-Andree Weiss
on
Tuesday, July 29, 2014
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html