Call of Duty: Black Ooops! Can lapsed dictator scoop video game profits?

Video games are becoming increasingly realistic and many include real-life people. Manuel Noriega, the former dictator of Panama, was featured in Call of Duty: Black Ops II. This game, released in 2012, features a character bearing Noriega’s name and likeness. In this game, that character helps the CIA to capture a terrorist but later turns against the agency. Noriega said that the game portrayed him as a kidnapper, murderer and enemy of the state, and that it had damaged his reputation. Noriega disapproves of the way his image was used, adding that it may create the impression that he had given his permission for it, when he had not.

Oliver North is also featured in the game, but his own voice has been used for his character, presumably indicating his consent to be portrayed in the game. Noriega however said that he had been neither consulted beforehand nor subsequently compensated. He further deplored that the game used his image and name to make money and therefore requested a share of the profits the game has generated. To this end he filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles against Activision Blizzard, the game company.

In the USA, there is a right to publicity, as established in Vanna White v Samsung Electronics (1993) where television personality Vanna White sued Samsung for using traits of her personality in one of their adverts, without her permission. Samsung had created a robot with a wig, gown and jewellery suggestive of Vanna White. The case reached the 9th Circuit, where she was eventually awarded damages on the basis that her right of publicity had been infringed. Noriega may seek to rely on this authority to pursue his case. There appears to be an uncontested clear portrayal of him, through the use of his name and physical traits.

Manuel Noriega was indicted in the United States and sentenced there. However, he was extradited to Panama to serve the rest of sentence in 2011. The Kats will all be watching to see how this action will proceed.
Call of Duty: Black Ooops! Can lapsed dictator scoop video game profits? Call of Duty: Black Ooops! Can lapsed dictator scoop video game profits? Reviewed by Unknown on Friday, August 15, 2014 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.