Wednesday whimsies

Maybe not, but still 
highly worthwhile
It's not the last chance to register for this year's IP Publishers and Editors Meeting, but it might be the last time this Kat plugs it before it takes place next Wednesday, 25 November.  It's free, it's fun and it's a great time and place to network with colleagues and fraternise with the competition.  Getting on for 50 people have now signed up, which is pretty impressive.  Guest speaker Peter Groves is among the star attractions. For further details and registration just click here.

Around the weblogs 1. Ben Challis's most recent CopyKat round-up on the 1709 Blog has more on the US "Happy Birthday" litigation and an account of Taylor Swift's experience as a defendant in infringement proceedings brought by Jessie Braham. On the same blog, Marie-Andrée Weiss writes up a dramatic French moral rights decision involving an equally dramatic arrangement of Poulenc's "Dialogue des Carmélites".  On IP Finance Mike Mireles takes a clever look at Google's License on Transfer Network and asks whether it can be utilised against patent trolls.

Around the weblogs 2.  Mark Anderson's ever-useful IP Draughts turns its attention to common pitfalls in IP licensing: they are (i) wrong type of transaction, (ii) mismatch of expectations, (iii) wrong mindset for negotiating deal and (iv)  being locked into a long-term, loveless relationship.  If you want to list any further pitfalls, do post them on Mark's blog.  Aistemos asks whether the terms "disruptive innovation" and "disruptive technology" are a help or a hindrance to current innovation and investment analyses, and also takes a look at the distribution and ownership of aquaculture patents in today's herding catfish post. Latest European Patent Office-related blogposts: FOSS Patents, here; Techrights, here. The EPO Blog itself reports on a successful start for PCT Direct.

Nathan the Wise? He will be -- with your help.  This Kat has been informed that Nathan Pennington, secretary of the Patent & Trade Mark Group, is preparing an MSc dissertation on the differences and similarities of approach to searching patent by professional searchers and patent attorneys. He is seeking volunteers to (i) complete a questionnaire to measure legal and technical background; (ii) do a quick pseudo search on PatBase, or another database if you prefer, so he can log the search approach.  All data collected will be anonymous and no personal data will be collected as part of the exercise. If you'd like to volunteer, you can contact Nathan on +44 (0)20 7440 9510 or email him at Do help if you can!
Wednesday whimsies Wednesday whimsies Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, November 18, 2015 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.