|
Holiday snap or ECS meeting? |
Readers of this blog may be
aware of the increasingly frequent activity of the European Copyright Society
(ECS), composed of 21 European academics active in this area of the law and
founded in 2012 "with the aim of creating a platform for critical and independent
scholarly thinking on European copyright law and policy".
Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge and current ECS
Chair) has just informed the IPKat that the Society has finally set up a website, so that you can get
all the relevant information, including photographs of its members.
Among the various activities, it is worth
recalling how, prior to the 2014 decision of the Court of Justice of the
European Union (CJEU) in Svensson [discussed at some length on this very blog] and contrary to the
Opinion of the Association Littéraire et Artistique Internationale (ALAI) adopted the view that hyperlinking in general should not fall within the scope of
copyright.
The ECS subsequently issued opinions on the notion of parody in
the aftermath of the Deckmyn decision [another case followed with interest by this blogger: see here and here] and
the importance of preserving the so called author principle at the time when
the Reprobel case was still pending [here and here].
The ECS is now back with its response to
the EU Commission's public consultation on the review of the Satellite and
Cable Directive [here]. It stresses how, despite the adoption of the country
of origin principle (aimed at facilitating rights clearance for transborder
transmissions), territorial
blocking occurs mostly with regard to satellite television services, especially
in relation to sports, films and television series.
As
to the core issue of the desirability as such of extending this principle to
online transmissions, the ECS appears to look at it favourably despite
stressing how this "is not an easy task". In its submission the ECS
also highlights certain shortcomings that may arise and need to be also
addressed.
More
specifically:
"Extending
the [Satellite and Cable] Directive’s country of origin model to online
audiovisual services will work effectively only in combination with certain
flanking measures, such as rules conditioning (or prohibiting) territorial
licensing and/or geo-blocking. Such rules could be based on art. 18 TFEU and
might take the form of ‘black’ and ‘grey’ lists setting out what kind of
geographical restrictions are or are not permitted."
In any
case, if EU copyright is in your heart and mind, stay tuned because *tomorrow* the EU
Commission will unveil next steps in its copyright reform agenda. These are likely
to include a proposal for a regulation on content portability. This Kat has had
the opportunity to see a draft of the latter, and really looks forward to seeing whether the version to be presented
tomorrow is the same ...
They... need a new website.
ReplyDelete