Industrial design applications worldwide, 2000-2014, from WIPI, WIPO (2015) |
Prepared by the good statisticians from WIPO's Economics & Statistics Division, the report covers patents, trade marks, industrial designs, and plant varieties. Ever wondered how Estonia ranks in international patent activity? 70th. Who is the 41st most active patent applicant in the world? Zhejian University in China. Where do the most active applicants for plant varieties come from? The Netherlands. There are also lots of pretty charts, colourful maps and tables.
WIPO Infographic, click for full size. |
Some caveats:
As is always the case with IP data, remember the caveats. IP stats are a measure of IP activity, great care should be taken before reading too much into them. The WIPI data is internationally aggregated data; data quality (accuracy and completeness) and collection methods vary across countries. (An appendix to report acknowledges these challenges and efforts to improve the data.)
In general, data like the WIPI is handy for looking at trends and relative measurements. Differences can indicate underlying changes, such as shifts in innovation, economic growth, IP strategies, or simply changes in data collection. Keep in mind that even when there are measurable changes, they may be statistically meaningless. Some differences will happen simply because of chance.
Looking for good party tricks? Delight your friends and family this holiday season by downloading the data and wowing them with exciting facts. Say, did you know that Wikimedia was one of the top 20 Madrid applicants in 2014? Now you do.
World Intellectual Property Indicators - What's happening in your neighbourhood?
Reviewed by Nicola Searle
on
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html