Power outage at the USPTO

Some Kat readers, as well as this Kat, found it impossible already yesterday to connect to the USPTO website. The following statement from the USPTO explains the situation:
"USPTO Power Outage Update Statement updated at 5:55 p.m. ET December 23, 2015 to add information related to filing deadlines.

A major power outage at USPTO headquarters occurred Wednesday, Dec. 22, resulting in damaged equipment that required the subsequent shutdown of many of our online and IT systems. This includes our filing, searching, and payment systems, as well as the systems our examiners across the country use. Additionally we are unable to receive faxed documents. We are working diligently to assess the operational impact on all our systems and to determine how soon they can be safely brought back into service in the coming days. We understand how critical these systems are for our customers, and our teams will continue to work around the clock to restore them as quickly as possible, though we are currently estimating that these systems will be impacted at least through the Christmas holiday on Friday, December 25. In light of this emergency situation, the USPTO will consider each day from Tuesday, December 22, 2015, through Thursday, December 24, 2015, to be a “Federal holiday within the District of Columbia” in accordance with the description and regulations in this official notice".

It will be interesting indeed to find out how this quite extraordinary state of affairs plays out after the holiday weekend.
Power outage at the USPTO Power outage at the USPTO Reviewed by Neil Wilkof on Thursday, December 24, 2015 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. PAIR is still unavailable today, and all systems are evidently not yet back to normal, but the USPTO announcement only covered the period until 24.12.

    That could be a problem for PCT RO/US second filings claiming a priority close to the deadline.

    This type of event appears to be covered under Rule 80.5 PCT, but it's not altogether clear to me whether a separate declaration referring to that rule must be made under the PCT, or if the national announcement is sufficient.

    A diligent enough attorney might be able to file with the IB in Geneva, or another office if available to the applicant(s).

    Incidentally, WIPO has working group for proposing changes in regulations in cases of "Delays and Force Majeure for Electronic Communications".


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.