Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme

This moggy was delighted to scamper across to Gray's Inn on Monday evening (actually from Court 4 where he had been watching the Brexit case, but of that perhaps more another time) to attend the launch of the IP Pro Bono scheme.  As the media release noted:

The IP Pro Bono scheme, launched by Sean Dennehey, Acting Chief Executive of the Intellectual Property Office, has been designed to help small businesses and individuals involved in disputes about intellectual property such as a patent, trade mark, protected design or copyright.
Mr Dennehey said:
“I am delighted to mark the launch of this new service. I am sure that the service will prove invaluable to those businesses struggling to afford the costs of professional representation. I am pleased that the IPO has been able to support the initiative and I look forward to hearing progress of the service.”
IP Pro Bono is a collaboration between a number of leading IP organisations including the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA), the professional body for patent attorneys in the United Kingdom – which manages the scheme, the Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA), the International Property Lawyers’ Association (IPLA) and The Law Society.
The scheme was set up in response to a challenge set by His Honour Judge Hacon, presiding judge of London’s Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, for IP legal services providers to offer advice and support to unrepresented claimants and defendants in IP disputes.
The service is available to those who cannot reasonably afford to pay for professional advice from a firm. A case officer will assess applications and, if the applicant meets the stated criteria, allocate the case to one of the participating firms on a rota basis.  
At the event, HH Judge Hacon highlighted the difficulties faced by the Court when cases involve unrepresented individuals, and he welcomed this scheme to provide advice.  Although the scheme is probably particularly well suited to the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (and its small claims track), it is not limited to that and may be appropriate for cases in the High Court as well.

Moreover, Mandy Haberman (famed, among other things, as the inventor of the Anywayup Cup, and now also a Director of the Intellectual Property Awareness Network) spoke movingly about the plight of the small enterprise faced with infringement at an early stage of their business - are you prepared to bet your entire livelihood on success in court?

There is now a spanking new website with details of the scheme here:

It was stressed that the placing of the case officer between the person seeking assistance and the professional advisor would ensure that the advisor was not left solely responsible for the person, and so, it is hoped, the scheme will be attractive for volunteer IP professionals.  It was also noted that we should probably stop using the phrase "pro bono" which is generally little understood outside legal circles, and say something like "at no cost", or even "free" instead.

So, says the IPKat, if you are an IP professional in the UK, please consider offering your services.
Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme Reviewed by Darren Smyth on Thursday, October 20, 2016 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.