Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

Have you so been busy changing your bad eating habits that you missed the IPKat last week? Don’t worry, here is the 116th edition of Never Too Late.

Neil Wilkof considers the complexity of TRIPS and the WTO dispute resolution mechanism as thoroughly discussed by Professor Matthew Kennedy, who warns of the danger of simply transplanting trade concepts into IP standards.

A warm welcome to the new GuestKats, Rosie Burbidge and Eibhlin Vardy!

Darren Smyth discusses the issue of the UK leaving the EU without Parliamentary approval. It highlights the UK legislative process in the context of Brexit and of what will be the fate of statutory instruments made under the European Communities Act 1972.

This book by Ian Waldon is a good reference for understanding the challenges of legal enforcement in the field of cybercrime. Katonomist Nicola Searle was particularly impressed by the author's comprehensive analysis of online IP crimes.

AmeriKat Annesley Merelle Ward recaps several opinions made expressed before the Competitiveness Council session that encourages UK participation in the implementation without delay of the unitary patent package.

Round-up post of the week's news and forthcoming events.

Ellie Wilson was fascinated with this book, edited by Mark Perry, particularly by the fresh perspectives on “non-conventional” trade marks and the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution policy. A truly contemporary mosaic on IP governance.


Never too late 115 [week ending on Sunday 25 September] | Book Review: Arnold reviews “Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property” | The English approach to obviousness – It all depends on the facts? | AIPPI Congress Report 3: Biosimilars – similar but different? | AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch – role of experts in litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century | Law & Economics – The Italian Edition | Friday Fantasies | Latest thoughts about Brexit and the UPC | Eye ‘should’ve’ done that! – Specsavers nears approval to trade mark single word “should’ve” & “shouldve” | A song of Ice and Ice | ChIPs Global Summit Report 3: Congratulations – your patent has been allowed, when is it finally final?

Never too late 114 [week ending on Sunday 18 September] | Commissioner unveils new copyright package | Open letter from Wikimedia et al on copyright package| Globalisation, Globalisation, Globalisation| Philip Morris loses investment arbitration | EPIP highlights | 20 million thanks | Tea & trade secret theft | Patent quality conference | free wifi networks & copyright infringement | Chiefs in Intellectual Property summit | Innovation and its discontents | GS Media rapid response event summary | AIPPI Congress reports

Never too late 113 [week ending on Sunday 11 September] Clinical trial data | Parody and free use in Germany | Infringing donuts | CJEU decision in GS Media | Fujifilm Kyowa v AbbVie | UK and the UPC | General Data Protection Regulation | Changes to IPO rules | Book review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court | General Electric and 3D printing | EPLAW mock trials

Never too late 112 [week ending on Sunday 4 September] 3 Cubist antibiotic patents revoked| Milan Court rejects application for 'blank' blocking order | Leaked copyright draft directive| Thursday Titibits | Super Kat exclusive| Mexico's new opposition system | EU General Data Protection Regulation | Hospira v Cubist | My My Mylan | Kasting Kall for Internkats

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo on Thursday, October 06, 2016 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.