The AmeriKat's professional life, be it on the Kat or sat at her desk litigating her hours away, involves a huge amount of coordination, support and opposition with lawyers from all over the world. One of the IPKat's key objectives is to bring this global IP community closer together by sharing IP decisions, legislation and practice from across the world with our readers, with the aim that by understanding our unique perspectives on the culture of IP practice we can work together to make IP a success story for innovators, creators, users and the public. With those grand aims, the AmeriKat thought it would be worthwhile to ask the next generation of global IP lawyers to illuminate IP practice in their jurisdiction, as well as to give readers some fun reading over their lunch-al-desko...
For the sixth in the series, we travel a couple hours east by air to Milan, Italy where Elena Varese at DLA Piper dispels some notions about Italian court delays, the joys of being an expert in various fields and wine tasting with Advocate General Cruz Villalón.
I am originally from Genoa, but I have been working for 9
years in Milan. There is a lot going on in Milan and it is difficult to make a
choice. I would highly recommend to see San Maurizio al Monastero Maggiore (the
Sistine Chapel of the North) with its wonderful paintings by Bernardino Luini
and to make a walk in the Navigli area. Coming to food, you should definitely
try the Milanese "risotto al salto with ossobuco" (i.e. a sort of crispy risotto with
marrowbone). Finally, go to Cantine Isola, to drink a good glass of wine in a
cosy and old atmosphere.
**********************
What can you see from
your office window right now?
Our Milan office is located in the financial heart of Milan,
right in front of the Stock Exchange building and in the city centre. The view
from my office window is on the old roofs and green terraces. I can also see a
white church tower and often beautiful sunsets.
When did you know
that you wanted to pursue a career in IP?
I always dreamt about being an art critic, but I thought it
was a very uncertain path. Then, I started the Law Faculty in Genoa and
discovered that IP was a good way to keep alive my passion for art, fashion and
music. I signed up to a specialised intellectual property course at the
University of Genoa and wrote my two dissertations on Copyright. After
graduation I undertook my LLM in IP in London, University College (UCL) [Elena was in the AmeriKat's class all those years ago]. In 2008 I
moved to Milan and started to work in the IP department of an international law
firm. I think I am lucky, as I discovered relatively soon that I wanted to
become an IP lawyer and made all the plans to put this in practice, since my
days at the University.
Walk us through a
typical day...
I arrive in the office around 9 am, then I start reading
e-mails and legal updates on specialized online directories and blogs. My work
is quite various and mainly involves drafting court briefs in different matters
from use of music in videogames, trademark rights over titles of magazines,
comparative advertising, parallel imports of alcoholic beverages, copyright and
designs on fashion creations or furniture or search orders on tissue-making
machines. I often speak in fashion law lectures and seminars and I am a regular
lecturer at Istituto Marangoni.
I tend to leave the office (on average) around 8.30 pm, although sometimes I
finish later or I keep working from home. I forgot to mention that on Thursdays
and Fridays during the lunch break I have my Yoga and Pilates classes!
What are the key
differences in your system that clients/other lawyers from outside the
jurisdiction find surprising or strange?
We have some unique provisions. For instance, for
unregistered trademarks or the protection of items that are produced on an
industrial scale, where the higher threshold of artistic value should be met to
trigger copyright protection. In
addition, applications for national IP rights could be enforced in Italy
without waiting for their grant.
Finally, in 2011 opposition procedures were introduced in
Italy, meaning that published trademark applications can be opposed before the
Italian PTO (UIBM), but only on a limited number of relative invalidity grounds
(earlier rights arising from unregistered trademarks, company or domain names
and well-known trademarks are excluded). Once the new EU Directive provisions
will be implemented into Italian Law, UIBM will be able to handle the whole
range of invalidity grounds (both absolute and relative), as well as revocation
actions against granted trademarks.
What are the key
challenges that are facing the next generation of IP lawyers in your
jurisdiction? How are those challenges different from the previous generation?
We are living in an increasingly globalized world and I
would say that the main challenges in IP for the younger generations are triggered
by Internet, social media and new technologies, where we need to adapt our old
tools of law to new creations, forms of infringement and remedies.
There is also another big challenge old and new generations
are called to, both as individuals and as law firms: pursuing effective
strategies to retain, promote and develop women lawyers. Many women work in IP
in Italy and we should be an example of innovation not only for the kind of law
we practise, but also for the culture we preach.
View from the terrace over Milano |
What are the misnomers
that people have about IP practice in your jurisdiction?
Let me discredit a legend: IP proceedings are not as long as
one might expect in Italy. Interim proceedings
are quite efficient and sometimes it is not necessary to start proceedings on
the merits (which last on average three years). In addition, courts are
increasingly recognising non-negligible damages to right holders. I am not
saying the system is perfect, but IP cases are decided surely faster and in a
more effective way than ordinary cases.
If you could change
one thing about IP practice in your jurisdiction, what would it be?
Encouraging even more young people to study, practice and
love IP!
What gives you the
biggest thrill in your job?
What I like the most is that you have always to become
expert in different fields, to understand the business of your clients: from
wine regulations to toys, from handbags to pharmaceutical preparations, from
architecture to cosmetic products. The issues that you face are always diverse
and it is good to have the possibility to discuss them also with colleagues and
clients from different countries and backgrounds.
What are the top
trends or cases that we should be looking out for in your jurisdiction in 2017?
Some recent decisions of the Court of Milan granted
copyright protection to a wider range of industrial items, including the shape
of the well-known Moon Boot and of the Ty Nant water bottle. As to the Moon
Boot case, it is one of the first times that a fashion item is granted with
copyright protection, which was traditionally accorded to furniture or
jewellery. I see more of these cases coming for the next future.
Also, there is much movement on the new case-law
developments on the liability of Internet service providers. In particular,
Italian courts should provide their view on the national implementation of the Telekabel decision of the CJEU,
clarifying to which extent and under which circumstances non-specific blocking
orders for copyright infringement are available to copyright holders. Further,
courts should specify which technical measures could be taken by ISPs to block
the infringing contents.
To be successful in
your jurisdiction, what are the key skills a young IP lawyer needs?
Commitment, incisiveness, passion for what you do and… sense
of humour!
What are you going
to/what did you eat for lunch today?
A salad with fresh tomatoes and few slices of San Daniele
ham.
What other
jurisdictions do you work with the most in your practice?
In a nutshell: US, UK and Germany, also in terms of
interoffice work.
Looking into your
crystal ball, where do you see the profession in 10 years’ time?
Lawyers should increasingly become business partners with
their clients. To do so, they are called to understand their clients' market.
This is the main driver that will reshape our profession in the next future.
If you could practice
IP law anywhere else in the world for a year, where would that be and why?
Here the list is long: London, where I have lived for two
years and studied IP, but I had never the chance to practice. Beijing, to
better understand the key issues of enforcing IP rights in such jurisdiction.
Luxembourg, to work at the CJEU and be part of its decision-making process.
If you could have
lunch with someone famous in the IP world (judge, lawyer, inventor, politician,
alive or dead), who would that be and why, and where would you take them?
I would say Advocate General Cruz Villalón, who was involved
in some of the most important IP cases before the CJEU. I would be interested
to understand how he makes his researches and which will be the upcoming hot
topics of the CJEU's decisions. And what a question: I would surely bring him
to an Italian wine tasting (I forgot to mention that I am a qualified sommelier
and that this passion also started while I was involved in an IP case regarding
a well-known sparkling wine).
Bone marrow and risotto...yum! |
What is the best
piece of advice you have ever been given?
A serious one and a funny one. As to the first, I will quote
one of my clients, who said that she did not like "No" lawyers, but
counsels that were able to find creative and practical solutions to minimize
risks. I always try to follow this, but I have no magic wand!
As to the second, I would surely quote my former flatmate Nura, who had a
golden rule: "Better overdressed
than underdressed". I have never put this last one in practice, as I
often change my shoes as soon as I get into the office.
If our readers were
to come to your city, what are the top three things you recommend they see, do
and eat (in that order)?
Life as an IP Lawyer: Milan
Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward
on
Friday, June 09, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html