Follow IPKat on a Sunday afternoon tour of the IP blogs! We have an update on the impact of Brexit on designs and trade mark legislation, further developments on the infighting at Nigeria's main copyright collecting society and a scathing attack on the US Supreme's court attitude to patents.
Patents
Rumors have been abound that China plans to extend its patent term to 25 years (see here), but it seems this may be been Fake News (see here). The SPC blog appealed for more information: China - patent term extensions allowable soon? See the comments for a useful update from Michael Lin (Marks & Clerk, Hong Kong).
Written description draws attention to an abstract on SSRN for a paper by Colleen Chien exploring the role of the innovator in the patent system: A Focus on Innovators Instead of Innovations. The abstract asks for a shift of focus to "a way of understanding and cultivating innovators that patent, not just patented innovation". Michael Risch of Written Description warmly supports this premise, and points us in the direction of a couple of interesting papers focusing on the stories of the people who innovate.
On IPwatchdog, Gene Quinn asks Did the Supreme Court intentionally destroy the U.S. patent system? in view of the Myriad, Mayo and Alice decisions. Gene Quinn proposes that, whilst "it is perfectly accurate to characterize this Court as a whole as anti-patent, it is quite another to characterize the Supreme Court as a knowing and intentional actor. That would require a level of understanding and appreciation they simply do not possess".
Designs
In Brexit news, Marques Class 99, highlights the draft legislation relating to semiconductor chip designs on the UK governments Brexit legislation information page, "Design Right (Semiconductor Topographies) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 201": BREXIT - draft chip law change.
Trade marks
Earlier this year Katfriend and AfroIP blogger Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie wrote for IPKat on the infighting at The Copyright Society of Nigeria (COSON), Nigeria’s main collecting society, from the perspective of the role of the sector regulator, the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) (IPKat post here). On the Afro-IP blog, Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie now reports on the recent step by the NCC to suspended the licence of COSON, and provides her further analysis: Infighting at Nigeria's main collecting society raises CMO governance issues.
IP finance asks whether the US Trademark register is too full: are fraudulent applications leading to a dearth of good trademarks for legitimate businesses and increasing search costs?: Solutions in Search of a Problem: The Trademark Register Clogged?
In more Brexit news, The Kluwer Trademark Blog reports on the statement by the European Commission that, following brexit, UK institutions and individuals will no longer be able to register domains using the .eu TLD: Entering the post-Brexit domain. The blog notes that the development appears to have caught EURid, the company responsible responsible for management of the .eu TLD, as unaware as everyone else, and that they received the communication with no prior warning or consultation.
Author: Rose Hughes
Patents
Rumors have been abound that China plans to extend its patent term to 25 years (see here), but it seems this may be been Fake News (see here). The SPC blog appealed for more information: China - patent term extensions allowable soon? See the comments for a useful update from Michael Lin (Marks & Clerk, Hong Kong).
Written description draws attention to an abstract on SSRN for a paper by Colleen Chien exploring the role of the innovator in the patent system: A Focus on Innovators Instead of Innovations. The abstract asks for a shift of focus to "a way of understanding and cultivating innovators that patent, not just patented innovation". Michael Risch of Written Description warmly supports this premise, and points us in the direction of a couple of interesting papers focusing on the stories of the people who innovate.
On IPwatchdog, Gene Quinn asks Did the Supreme Court intentionally destroy the U.S. patent system? in view of the Myriad, Mayo and Alice decisions. Gene Quinn proposes that, whilst "it is perfectly accurate to characterize this Court as a whole as anti-patent, it is quite another to characterize the Supreme Court as a knowing and intentional actor. That would require a level of understanding and appreciation they simply do not possess".
Designs
In Brexit news, Marques Class 99, highlights the draft legislation relating to semiconductor chip designs on the UK governments Brexit legislation information page, "Design Right (Semiconductor Topographies) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 201": BREXIT - draft chip law change.
 |
| Brexit Kat |
Earlier this year Katfriend and AfroIP blogger Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie wrote for IPKat on the infighting at The Copyright Society of Nigeria (COSON), Nigeria’s main collecting society, from the perspective of the role of the sector regulator, the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) (IPKat post here). On the Afro-IP blog, Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie now reports on the recent step by the NCC to suspended the licence of COSON, and provides her further analysis: Infighting at Nigeria's main collecting society raises CMO governance issues.
IP finance asks whether the US Trademark register is too full: are fraudulent applications leading to a dearth of good trademarks for legitimate businesses and increasing search costs?: Solutions in Search of a Problem: The Trademark Register Clogged?
In more Brexit news, The Kluwer Trademark Blog reports on the statement by the European Commission that, following brexit, UK institutions and individuals will no longer be able to register domains using the .eu TLD: Entering the post-Brexit domain. The blog notes that the development appears to have caught EURid, the company responsible responsible for management of the .eu TLD, as unaware as everyone else, and that they received the communication with no prior warning or consultation.
Author: Rose Hughes
Around the IP Blogs!
Reviewed by Rose Hughes
on
Sunday, June 03, 2018
Rating:
Reviewed by Rose Hughes
on
Sunday, June 03, 2018
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html