Around the IP Blogs!

The Kluwer Copyright blog has a couple of posts this week. First up, a look at the case ofJohnson v. New Destiny Christian Center Church, Inc., USA in which the operator of a YouTube channel criticizing the pastor of a church was not entitled to punitive damages in a malicious prosecution case when the church relied on counsel in initiating a copyright infringement suit. Secondly, there was a summary of the aftermath of the verdict in C-166/15 Ranks (Microsoft).

IPTango has an interesting post on the objection raised by the Guna people against a limited edition Nike design that incorporated traditional ‘mola’ patterns. The shoes were to be a tribute to Puerto Rico but the Guna people, the second largest indigenous community in Panama, objected to the design.

This Kat approves of the design of these shoes, at least for use as a pillow
Kluwer Patent Blog has posted on a change in French law. The law change relates the French National Assembly definitively adopting the PACTE bill and the post looks at its impact on industrial property.

EPLaw has a summary of the NL case between Mobile Sanitary Solutions B.V. v. TWT Verhuur B.V at the court of Appeal in The Hague. There is also a look at the Opinion in TATA STEEL IJMUIDEN V. ARCELORMITTAL before the Dutch Supreme Court.

PATENTLYO provides a summary of Dodocase Vr, Inc. v. Merchsource, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2019), in particular whether a right to file an IPR petition can be contractually waived and if so, how? There is also a review of the Federal Circuit’s dismissal of AXV’s appeal in AVX Corp. v. Presidio Components, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019) where it was held that the patent challenger lacked standing to appeal after losing on the merits in the Inter Partes Review (IPR).

Marques 46 has posted about the amendments to China’s trademark law which has recently passed and will come into effect on 1 November 2019.

IP Draughts has a somewhat light-hearted look at which UK Prime Minister they would want negotiating an IP agreement, with their own proposal of Margaret Thatcher.
Around the IP Blogs! Around the IP Blogs! Reviewed by Jonathan Pratt on Monday, June 03, 2019 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.