A monograph
by Dr James Griffin, a Senior Lecturer at University of Exeter and Senior Visiting
Research Fellow at Queen Mary University of London, discusses the concept of
creativity, how its centrality within the legal regulation has shifted, and
what the future of a creative State might look like.
Image: Elgar Law, Technology and Society |
In the introductory part, Dr
Griffin reflects on the history of productive creation and how creativity, in
the form of collaboration and conflict, has been an integral part of human
history and a necessity of the human condition. Special attention is drawn to
the relationship between the creative individual and the State. The author
argues that the centrality of a creative endeavour should be considered in the
legal regulation of creative works.
The monograph then proceeds to explore to what degree State
regulation has begun to depart from the core concerns of creativity and, in
doing so, considers how individuals’ own creativity is influenced by the
creativity of others. Dr Griffin considers the issue of creativity within the individual,
which despite lying at the core of the human experience, tends to be limited at
the State level to issues of economics and property rights.
The author distinguishes between ‘inner
creativity’ (individual ideas and thoughts), which is shielded from State
interference, and ‘outer creativity’ (physical expression of ideas), which the
State can and does seek to affect. The Law seeks to regulate the substance of
thought, but ultimately only regulates the output, which does not directly
control inner creative thought, but nevertheless may influence subsequent
thoughts and acts of expression. New technologies, such as 3D and 4D printing,
and augmented reality, presumably allow for a “more nuanced and precise [State]
intervention in the thoughts of the individual, by more closely regulating not
just what can be expressed, but also the mechanic processes of creating.”
Griffin reflects on the work of a
number of philosophers, notably Plato, Locke, Hume and Nietzsche, as they
contemplate creativity while focusing on its different catalysts and the
functional relationship of creativity to the State. Against this background, the
author concludes that “[i]t is the nature of creativity that binds society
together and so it is that we need to analyse and critique if society is to
become more ontologically concerned with its core”. The State’s increasing (?) reliance on
concepts of property and economy as the lens by which to view the creative
process may not only lead to a blurring of the ‘inner’ and ‘outer’ distinction
but also serve as a potential suppressor of creativity altogether. Dr Griffin explores
whether intellectual property rights provided by law are appropriate in the
modern era and proposes specific ways how the traditional statutory focus may
be expanded.
The author criticises the current
legislative system, whereby the emphasis is placed on protecting right holders
from infringement. This is best seen in
the author criticism of legislation driven by “unjustified threats”, where the
statutory provisions are principally based on a threat of legal action in
relation to specific types of rights, but the threat of action is not justified
because there is a reduced likelihood of success should the action reaches
trial. Instead, he argues, the focus should be placed on the production of knowledge
and the necessity of creativity in doing so.
A chapter is dedicated to
investigating the concept of reproduction as part of the proprietary discourse.
According to Dr Griffin, when it comes to the notion of the reproduction of
third party rights, the Law takes a most circumscribed view, resting on the
premise of an individual creator, working in isolation without reproducing the
thoughts and ideas of others. Such assumptions are no longer credible (if they
ever were) and a proper appreciation of technological advance should presuppose
one’s ability to share information. Creative sharing (and re-sharing) is
contrasted with, in the words of the author, the “mindless enforcement of
historic proprietary boundaries”, thus calling for the traditional concepts of
property and capitalism to be superseded by merit and entitlement to avoid
limiting creative expression.
Chapters 7-9 focus on the proposed
systems of regulation and governance of creativity: (1) identifying the
processes of creativity; (2) reforming the licensing system and establishing a
creativity fund to allow easier access to copyrighted works and to provide
financial means for the creators; and (3) introducing a new regulatory body - Digital
Copyright Exchange Tribunal, would be a means through which the State could
directly interface with creativity. [Merpel has to jump in here - so only a new
State bureaucracy can solve the problems of the State's misconduct in
facilitating creativity?].
The closing chapter discusses the
future of the creative State. Dr Griffin embraces the task of resolving the
conflict between State regulation with a capitalistic undertone and the focus
on better facilitating creativity. The author calls upon the State to refocus
its attention to creativity, contending that the making of a cultural work,
specifically a copyrighted work, is a key to the future of the State in the
information age. The current disjunction between the creative process and
bureaucratic regulation should be reformulated in such a way that it ensures
that latter does not materially frustrate the former; instead, there should be
an engagement between them.
Thus, legal rules should
encourage creation of new works rather than preserving the “prescriptive
bureaucratic acceptance of rigid property boundaries”, because the technology
is removing the need for such boundaries. Centrality of creativity could
potentially lead to further creativity and subsequently to the generation of
new property and capital.
This book will be particularly useful
to scholars and students interested in pondering how the relation between creativity and legal
regulation will play out in the face of emerging technologies. Regulators and policy makers may also find it helpful in considering legal reforms that
are aimed at better shaping the creative State.
Extent: 304 pp
ISBN: 978 1 78643 826 3
Hardback: EE Website £81.00
E-Book: Google
Play £21.92
Book Review: The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality
Reviewed by Ieva Giedrimaite
on
Sunday, June 30, 2019
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html