The BBC reports that the Plagiarism Advisory Service, based at Northumbria University is displaying a new service at a conference in Newcastle. It is promoting software developed in the US that detects whether students’ work is original by comparing it with the contents of four databases, which include the contents of many webpages and previously submitted student essays. The PAS has identified a need for its service, claiming that in a survey of 350 students which it carried out, 25% of those admitted to copying text from other sources.

The IPKat hopes that the PAS has sought permission from the authors of the webpages and previously submitted student essays to include them in its databases, otherwise it too could be guilty of copyright infringement.

UPDATE: The PAS tells us that it has received confirmation from the software developers, iParadigm that
"We adhere to the principles outlined at and more specifically those outlined in the RFC document This is the defacto standard for all major crawlers, i.e., Google, Alltheweb,Microsoft, etc."
The IPKat took a look at these. Basically what it seems to say is that websites can get themselves excluded if they set up a file to that effect.

More copycats here, here and here
COPYING THE COPIED? COPYING THE COPIED? Reviewed by Unknown on Thursday, July 01, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a downline online payplan safelist site/blog. It pretty much covers downline online payplan safelist related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.