HARVARD MOUSE GRADUATES FROM MUNICH WITH AN AMENDED PATENT


This from Findlaw: the European Patent Office has just upheld a Harvard University patent on a mouse genetically altered to develop cancer, but restricted its wording so that it applies only to mice and not to all species of rodents. The pan-European patent, granted in 1992, protects the method of producing the animals. But the ruling, which closes a years-long legal battle with environmental groups, added further qualifications to a 2001 ruling that limited the patent to rodents, rather than mammals in general.

The EPO acknowledged concerns about ethical questions and animal rights, but also said the medical uses of the patent must be weighed. A collection of religious, environmental and animal protection groups, among them Greenpeace, had argued for the patent to be cancelled, saying that it violated the dignity of living beings. After the 2001 ruling, six organisations filed an appeal. The development of the mouse was intended to ease research and treatment of tumours in humans. The US Patent and Trademark Office granted a patent to the Harvard mouse in 1988, the first "transgenic" animal patent to be granted. The patent from the Munich-based European Patent Office is valid in 11 European countries.

The IPKat considers it highly appropriate that an altered mouse should be the subject of an amended patent. He also notices that the university only designated 11 countries; the EPO now allows a patent application to designate up to 28 member states.

Altered mice here, here and here
Mouse-related patents here, here and here
HARVARD MOUSE GRADUATES FROM MUNICH WITH AN AMENDED PATENT HARVARD MOUSE GRADUATES FROM MUNICH WITH AN AMENDED PATENT Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, July 06, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.