OKAY FOR FRENCH TO BAN TRANSMISSION OF BRITISH ALCOHOL ADVERTISEMENTS


Another interesting case from the ECJ today -- C-429/02 Bacardi France SAS v Television Francaise 1 SA and others . Bacardi makes and sells numerous alcoholic beverages in most countries of the world, including Bacardi rum, Martini and Duval pastis. Darmon and Girosport are companies which negotiate on behalf of TF1 for television retransmission rights for football matches. Relying on the alleged fact that Darmon and Girosport put pressure on foreign football clubs to refuse to allow Bacardi’s brand names to appear on advertising hoardings around sports stadia, Bacardi sought an order in the French courts that Darmon, Girosport and TF1 should cease that conduct as being incompatible with Article 59 of the Treaty. After that application was rejected both at first instance and on appeal, Bacardi appealed on a point of law. As it was in doubt as to the compatibility with Community law of the French rules prohibiting television advertising for alcoholic beverages marketed in France, in the case of indirect television advertising resulting from the appearance on screen of hoardings visible during the retransmission of bi-national sporting events taking place in other Member States, the Court of Cassation stayed the proceedings and referred the issue to the ECJ. According to that court's ruling today,
"1. The first sentence of Article 2(2) of Council Directive 89/552 does not preclude a Member State from prohibiting television advertising for alcoholic beverages marketed in that State, in the case of indirect television advertising resulting from the appearance on screen of hoardings visible during the retransmission of bi-national sporting events taking place in the territory of other Member States.

That kind of indirect television advertising is not to be classed as ‘television advertising’ within the meaning of Articles 1(b), 10 and 11 of the directive.

2. Article 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) does not preclude a Member State from prohibiting television advertising for alcoholic beverages marketed in that State, in the case of indirect television advertising resulting from the appearance on screen of hoardings visible during the retransmission of bi-national sporting events taking place in other Member States".

The IPKat notes that, where health and public welfare considerations are involved, brand promotion continues to be of lower priority.
OKAY FOR FRENCH TO BAN TRANSMISSION OF BRITISH ALCOHOL ADVERTISEMENTS OKAY FOR FRENCH TO BAN TRANSMISSION OF BRITISH ALCOHOL ADVERTISEMENTS Reviewed by Jeremy on Tuesday, July 13, 2004 Rating: 5

4 comments:

  1. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a christmas gift site/blog. It pretty much covers gift ideas for christmas related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a advertising internet marketing missouri site/blog. It pretty much covers advertising internet marketing missouri related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Informative blog about classefieds.
    I will definately bookmark you. My site
    is about classefieds
    You or your visitors might like it too!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a internet marketing company site/blog. It pretty much covers internet marketing company related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.