The BBC reports that the Chairman of the Education Select Committee (a body within the UK Parliament) is to ask the Secretary of State for Education, Charles Clarke, to investigate the sale of fake degrees which purport to be awarded by established UK universities, including Oxford. The Guardian newspaper conducted an investigation into the trade, finding that it could obtain genuine-looking degrees for £165. The universities want the Government to take action. However, the Department of Education has said "Where there has been a breach of the law, local authority trading standards or the police will take enforcement action depending on the offence committed. However in cases where no law has been broken it is up to institutions affected to take civil action."
The IPKat thinks that those who buy the degrees will probably know that they’re fakes, but the idea is to fool those who are shown them by the purchasers into believing that they’re real. He wonders therefore if the universities would have a good passing off case based on post-sale confusion. He also notes that, if the fake certificates have been copied from genuine certificates, they may infringe copyright in the real thing. Finally he asks, does anyone want to buy a degree from the University of Katminster?

Fake degrees here
Fake universities here and here
DEGREES OF DECEPTION DEGREES OF DECEPTION Reviewed by Unknown on Tuesday, July 06, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.