This from the Telegraph: Marvel Enterprises, the creator of comic book heroes including Spider-Man, The Incredible Hulk and X-Men, is suing The Walt Disney Co for $55m (£29m). Marvel says it is owed royalties generated from animated television programmes based on the characters that were broadcast on Disney's ABC Family channel in the US. According to a lawsuit filed in a Los Angeles court, Marvel originally reached agreements in the late 1990s for the cartoon characters to be used by Fox Family Worldwide, the US television company. Disney inherited the rights after it bought Fox Family Worldwide in 2001. Marvel alleges that Disney has not kept proper records of royalties due under the agreements. The company also alleges that Disney failed to aggressively market the shows following the renewed popularity of the characters after they were featured in a series of blockbuster Hollywood films in recent years. Marvel finally claims that it is owed money from the licensing of music associated with the television shows.
This lawsuit is just the latest legal controversy to hit Disney. The media giant is also being sued for alleged copyright infringement on the song The Lion Sleeps Tonight, which featured in the Lion King film and musical. That lawsuit alleges the song is based on another song called Mbube ("lion" in Zulu) that was written by a Zulu migrant worker in 1939.
The IPKat wishes someone would make a film about him. Then he too could get in on the action and start suing for colossal sums. He also notes that, with good drafting and meaningful compliance with licence terms, most contract-based disputes can usually be avoided.
Marvels here, here and here
More royalties here, here and here
LICENSED USE OF CHARACTERS SPARKS MAMMOTH ROYALTY SUIT
![LICENSED USE OF CHARACTERS SPARKS MAMMOTH ROYALTY SUIT]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, July 20, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html