The BBC reports on a pork pie panic that is gripping Leicestershire. The people of Melton Mowbray, led by local councillor Matthew O’Callaghan, are keen to see the Melton Mowbray pie protected as a geographical indication under the EU regime. They argue that the pie, with its biscuity crust, grey-tinged meat and crooked sides should be protected because
"This is intellectual property…It's part of our food heritage. And it should belong to the people that made it."
The move is being driven by a group of seven manufacturers of the pie. However, other UK pie-producers aren’t happy. Northern Foods, which makes “Melton Mowbray” pies in Shropshire and Wiltshire, argues that the term merely refers to a style and quality of product and points to the fact that it has been making “Melton Mowbrays” for 100 years. Northern Foods initially threatened to bring the matter to court. However, DEFRA has agreed to take a second look at the application for protected status.
The IPKat isn’t really an expert on pork pies, but he does know that it can’t be assumed that a product indication is worthy of geographical indication status just because it coincides with the name of a geographical region. Many recipes that started off in single places have spread in popularity and are now produced in other locations. To “claw back” such product names could have dire effects on competition. Melton Mowbray may not be an example of such a “claw back though”. The IPKat waits to see what the UK Government has to say.
The joys of Melton Mowbray here
Spy the pie here, here
Other pork pies of note here, here and here
"This is intellectual property…It's part of our food heritage. And it should belong to the people that made it."
The move is being driven by a group of seven manufacturers of the pie. However, other UK pie-producers aren’t happy. Northern Foods, which makes “Melton Mowbray” pies in Shropshire and Wiltshire, argues that the term merely refers to a style and quality of product and points to the fact that it has been making “Melton Mowbrays” for 100 years. Northern Foods initially threatened to bring the matter to court. However, DEFRA has agreed to take a second look at the application for protected status.
The IPKat isn’t really an expert on pork pies, but he does know that it can’t be assumed that a product indication is worthy of geographical indication status just because it coincides with the name of a geographical region. Many recipes that started off in single places have spread in popularity and are now produced in other locations. To “claw back” such product names could have dire effects on competition. Melton Mowbray may not be an example of such a “claw back though”. The IPKat waits to see what the UK Government has to say.
The joys of Melton Mowbray here
Spy the pie here, here
Other pork pies of note here, here and here
THE PIE PIPER OF MELTON MOWBRAY
![THE PIE PIPER OF MELTON MOWBRAY]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Thursday, July 29, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html