Coca-Cola may be the world's leading brand in terms of consumer recognition and market muscle, but it has other attributes too. Ananova reports that Indian farmers are reportedly spraying their cotton and chilli fields with Coca-Cola to protect them from pests. They say it's much cheaper than chemical pesticides and just as effective at controlling bugs (reports The Guardian). Hundreds of farmers are reported to have switched to cola in Andhra Pradesh and Chattisgarh states. Gotu Laxmaiah, a farmer from Ramakrishnapuram, said he was delighted after spraying cola on his cotton crops:
"I observed that the pests began to die after the soft drink was sprayed on my cotton".
Farmers say their cola sprays are invaluable because they are safe to handle, do not need to be diluted and are cheap. One litre of pesticide costs around £120 but one-and-a-half litres of locally made cola is about 35p. A spokesman for Coca-Cola said:
"Soft drinks do not act in a similar way to pesticides when applied to the ground or crops. There is no scientific basis for this and the use of soft drinks for this purpose would be totally ineffective".
The IPKat has often heard stories of the dangerous effects of Coke, but has never before heard of so destructive a use being so heavily praised.

Is Coke dangerous? Click here and here
THE DRINK THAT KILLS ... THE DRINK THAT KILLS ... Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, November 03, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.