HENKEL KEEPS ITS BOTTLE IN BATTLE WITH OHIM


The European Court of Justice's Court of First Instance has just ruled this morning in Case T-393/02 Henkel v OHIM, an appeal against the refusal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to allw Henkel's application to register, as a Community trade mark for soaps, gels etc, , a three-dimensional mark consisting of the shape of a white and transparent bottle. On this occasion the appeal was successful. As the CFI said (at paragraphs 47-48 of its decision):
"47 ... [T]he three-dimensional mark applied for is unusual and capable of enabling the products in question to be distinguished from those having a different commercial origin. That position is supported by the registration by the applicant of a three-dimensional mark having an identical shape to that of the mark applied for in the present case, in 11 Member States.

48 It follows from all the above considerations, and without there being any need to reach a decision on the other arguments put forward by the applicant, that the Board of Appeal was wrong to hold that the mark applied for was devoid of any distinctive character for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94".
Having seen the illustration of the bottle which features on the ECJ's website, the IPKat wholeheartedly agrees: the bottle in question is quite a memorable, even in the absence of word marks, logos and other material that might also serve to distinguish it from the bottles of other traders in respect of the same goods.

Historical bottles here
Best British bottles here
White bottles here; blue bottles here and here
HENKEL KEEPS ITS BOTTLE IN BATTLE WITH OHIM HENKEL KEEPS ITS BOTTLE IN BATTLE WITH OHIM Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, November 24, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.