Last Thursday, 28 October, the IPKat commented on the use of the word "nerd" as a means of identifying the characteristics of the hypothetical person skilled in the art, against whom the inventive quality of a putatively patentable invention was to be mentioned. Today the IPKat received his copy of the Sweet & Maxwell Reports of Patent Cases in which the "nerd" case (Rockwater v Technip France) has just been reported. The key words at the top of the law report read, in the relevant part:
"Patent -- Laying flexible pipes offshore -- Infringement -- Novelty -- Inventive step -- Person skilled in the art -- Whether a "nerd" or part-way to being an "android" ... "
No-one can ever say that the law reports make dull reading. Androids take note.

More on androids here, here, here and here
IT'S THAT NERD AGAIN IT'S THAT NERD AGAIN Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, November 03, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Hey, you left out Marvin -!


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.