Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / GOOGLE IN COPYRIGHT CLAIM

GOOGLE IN COPYRIGHT CLAIM


The BBC reports that the owner of the Perfect 10 website, which shows nude photographs, is suing Google for copyright infringement and harming his ability to make profits. He claims that Google’s search engine provides free usernames and passwords to Perfect 10 and also that Google reproduces photos from Perfect 10 on other of its websites as thumbnail sketches.

The IPKat says: copyright infringement it may be, but any website that gets on the wrong side of Google is likely to be cutting off the route to stacks of consumers who would not otherwise find it.

How image search engines work here
Nude pictures here and here
GOOGLE IN COPYRIGHT CLAIM GOOGLE IN COPYRIGHT CLAIM Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, November 25, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousThursday, 3 November 2005 at 09:24:00 GMT

    If you would just take your time to know your way around, you could discover

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.