Electric avenue

Sunrise, sunset

The Tokelau Islands domain name registry has announced the introduction of a sunrise period. It appears that while the islands have a population of only a thousand, 1.7million .tk domain names have been granted. Thus, until 3 December, only holders of trade marks will be able to apply for domain names, which will have to correspond with their trade marks.

The IPKat can’t quite understand the popularity of the .tk suffix. Is he missing something really obvious? The only reasons he can think of are (a) TK is an abbreviation for ‘traditional knowledge’ or more likely (b) at least some registration is free, in return for hosting advertising content on .tk sites.

Misaddressed emails lead to trade mark suit

Internetnews.com carries news of an interesting trade mark dispute between
First Niagara Insurance Brokers (an insurance broker) and First Niagara Financial Group (a bank). The insurance broker uses the firstniagra.com domain name, and the bank uses first-niagra.com. The insurance broker claims that confused consumers of the bank have been wrongly emailing them. These emails often contain sensitive personal data, including bank details. There is no allegation that the information has been misused in any way.

The IPKat says that this is a strange case, since the effect of the insurance broker taking action is essentially to protect the bank’s customers. Having said that, it can’t be much fun for the broker to have to receive, and deal with, emails not intended for it.

Electric avenue Electric avenue Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, November 02, 2007 Rating: 5


  1. (b) is correct: you can point the domain at an existing URL for free, but get an advertising banner.


  2. The privacy policy of .tk domains may provide a clue to its popularity. At least for free domain names it names itself both registrar and registrant. Effectively obviating whois queries.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.