Friday flashes

To sign the SpicyIP online petition to put pressure on the Indian government to create a modern patent database and to make patent office decisions available online, click here.

The IPKat has learned via Stephanie Bodoni (Bloomberg) that this week the European Union approved plans to open access to cheaper medicines for poor nations, letting developing nations with limited or no pharmaceutical production import generic copies of patented drugs from other World Trade Organization countries. This decision, which was apparently made without any discussion, according to a statement by the bloc's foreign ministers, crossed the last hurdle to ratification by the EU of the changes to TRIPs (the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights).

Slightly embarrassed, the IPKat confesses that he can't remember who sent him news that the Software Freedom Law Center has filed copyright lawsuits against two US companies, High-Gain Antennas and Xterasys, alleging that they are redistributing software in violation of the GNU GPL (General Public License). Says the SLFC, the two companies are distributing BusyBox -- a lightweight set of standard Unix utilities commonly used in embedded systems licensed under GPL version 2 -- without meeting the GPL requirement of providing access to the source code of their implementation. High-Gain vigorously denies the allegations; Xterasys was not available for comment.
Friday flashes Friday flashes Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, November 23, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.