"If I had a (war)hammer ..."

The BBC brings news of a copyright row which, it says, may result in one of the most ambitious fan films ever made never being shown before an audience. The film, Damnatus, was made by German fans of the Warhammer 40,000 game. The 110 minute production, which apparently took four years in the planning stage, was directed and produced by Huan Vu.

Warhammer 40,000 - a science fiction wargame - is owned by Games Workshop, which has refused to give permission for the film to be shown. The company blames German copyright law which, it says, vests inalienable rights in the film's German creators which can't be assigned to Games Workshop even if the authors are willing to vest their rights in that company. But (the report startlingly declares), by sanctioning the release of the film without this assignment, Games Workshop would essentially be giving up the title to the Warhammer 40,000 intellectual property.

The news item quotes the IPKat's friend Guido Westkamp, a lecturer in intellectual property law at Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, as saying that copyright cases were always tricky to resolve.

The IPKat agrees with Guido that this is the case, but hopes the parties can try a little harder. After all, even without assignments of rights, business in Germany manages to run remarkably smoothly because sensible contract terms can protect the interests of creators and commercialisers alike. Merpel adds, I couldn't care less about the film - I just don't copyright to have to take the blame!

Read The Register thread on this issue here
"If I had a (war)hammer ..." "If I had a (war)hammer ..." Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, November 08, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.