Friday furniture

The IPKat's friend Jim Davies was the first of many people to send him a link (see here and here) to news that one Dutch teenager was arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from "rooms" in Habbo Hotel, a 3D social networking website. The value of the virtual theft is put at 4,000 euros, the real-world sum for which the virtual furniture was purchased. The six are suspected of moving the stolen furniture into their own Habbo rooms, after tricking victims into handing over their Habbo passwords by creating fake Habbo websites.

Says the IPKat, I don't recall reading anything about this in the Directive on copyright and the information society. Merpel adds, I'm disappointed that the suspects weren't dealt with by virtual police.

American celebrity Martha Stewart has apparently resolved the dispute between her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, and some of her neighbours concerning the scope of the company's intention to register the word KATONAH as a US trade mark. Her company can seek registration for furniture, mirrors, pillows and chair cushions, but has agreed not to pursue plans to register it for "hardware, paint, lighting and home textiles".

Left: a view of Katonah Avenue, Katonah

The problem is that Katonah is (i) the name of the village where Stewart lives and (ii) a 17th century Indian chief. Other residents objected to her using the name for commercial purposes and feared the trade mark would damage existing businesses. Some American Indians objected too [Merpel ponders, were they objecting or did they merely have reservations ...?].
The IPKat thanks his friend Miri Frankel for the link.
Friday furniture Friday furniture Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, November 16, 2007 Rating: 5


  1. Merpel,
    Actually the police did set up a presence in Habbo world.

    They're all mad...

  2. Habbo world looks pretty cool, good post.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.