Monday miscellany

The IPKat, Merpel, Tufty and the AmeriKat wish all their readers a very happy new week!

Coming soon. This Tuesday, 24 November, is the annual "Copying Without Infringing" conference (programme here), with IPKat team member Jeremy in the chair. Late bookings are still welcome! In two Tuesdays time, on 8 December, Professor Toshiko Takenaka gives the PatLit seminar, "Patent Litigation in the US and Japan: What's the Difference?" This event is fun and it's free (details here).

From the IPKat's friend Jean-François Vanden Eynde (eBrand Services FBS S.A. - EuroDNS) comes news that Swedish online clothing and tech retailer Sandryds Handel has assumed ownership of The Pirate Bay’s logo and plans to use it for marketing USB sticks. The Pirate Bay founders had never registered the mark and always let it be reproduced. Peter Sunde, one of the four Pirate Bay co-founders, says they will challenge the Swedish Patent and Registration Office's decision to allow the mark's registration. Further details from Wired here.

Around the weblogs. For those who wonder whether a longer copyright term provides a greater or a lesser degree of incentive to creative productivity, the ever-provocative Howard Knopf (in Excess Copyright) takes a look at some economic research and theory. Meanwhile Fashion law weblog Fashionista-at-Law has some news: Fashionista has aquired a little sister Modeliste, who not only contributes comments but tweets.

"The Penny Drops" is the title of this year's Annual Convergence Survey, carried out by YouGov for London-based law firm Olswang LLP. The report based on the survey -- all 96 pages of it -- will be launched on Wednesday morning, 25 November. If you can't be there for the grand unveiling, the IPKat will try to make sure that all the juiciest bits of this treat are served up for your delectation on this weblog.
Monday miscellany Monday miscellany Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, November 23, 2009 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.