BREAKING NEWS: Google Books Library Project is FAIR USE

It was just a bit more than a year ago that Google and the Association of American Publishers (AAP) concluded a settlement agreement (here) that put an end to copyright infringement proceedings first brought against Google in 2005 by five AAP member publishers (McGraw-Hill, Pearson Education, Penguin Group USA, John Wiley & Sons, and Simon & Schuster) over its Google Books Library Project

However, the settlement achieved with AAP did not affect the (still) ongoing litigation between the Authors Guild and Google.

As reported by the IPKat, in late 2012 Google submitted a 
brief to the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in which it basically asked the Court to reject Judge Denny Chin's ruling in May 2012 that let the Authors Guild sue Google on behalf of all authors whose books were scanned without permission. 

In July last the Second Circuit delivered its 
decision, substantially agreeing with Google and holding Judge Chin's class certification as "premature in the absence of a determination by the District Court [ie Judge Chin] of the merits of Google's 'fair use' defense". 

Hence, the Second Circuit decided to remand the cause to the District Court for consideration of the fair use issues.

As reported by Reuters a few minutes ago, today Judge Chin accepted Google's argument that 
that its scanning of more than 20 million books for an electronic database, and making "snippets" of text available for online searches, constituted fair use. "In my view, Google Books provide significant public benefits", said Judge Chin.

Today's ruling is BIG news for anyone interested in copyright. This Kat promises to read the decision as soon as possible and summarise the main points on this blog. So: stay tuned! 

UPDATE: The summary judgment order is now available here.
BREAKING NEWS: Google Books Library Project is FAIR USE BREAKING NEWS: Google Books Library Project is FAIR USE Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, November 14, 2013 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.