|
EU copyright fans can't wait for the Final Plenary of Licences for Europe |
As fans of all
things EU copyright will perfectly know, tomorrow will be the day when the
final plenary meeting to conclude the Licences for Europe initiative takes
place.
Licences for
Europe was launched following an Orientation Debate held at the end of 2012,
as part of a two-pronged plan of the Commission to
modernise EU copyright.
Licences for
Europe has been envisaged as a forum to which relevant stakeholders
reunited in four working groups could contribute to
deliver rapid progress through practical industry-led solutions in certain
areas, including:
- Cross-border
portability of services;
- User-generated
content (UGC) and licensing for small-scale users of protected works;
- Facilitating the
deposit and online accessibility of films in the EU;
- Promoting
efficient text and data mining (TDM) for scientific purposes.
Over the past few
months the IPKat has reported on some "issues" emerged during the activities of the various working groups, in particular those on UGC (here) and TDM (here).
Today, on her way
back to England after attending an event on TDM in Brussels, this
Kat could not help but wonder whether she should have bought that
yummy-looking Belgian chocolate box what would happen tomorrow during
the Final Plenary. While absorbed in such speculations, she received an email
from a reader who also happens to have participated in the activities of the
working group on UGC. Writing under the usual nome de plume of Robert Schumann,
he/she provided both an interesting update on the results achieved by this working
group and some crystal-ball-gazing as to what may happen tomorrow.
Here's what
'Robert' writes:
“So here is a little update on the User-Generated
Content working group of the Licenses for Europe stakeholder dialogue ahead of
tomorrow’s final plenary. As I had predicted earlier, the group failed to produce any
meaningful outcome at all. As a result there will be no conclusions from the
Commission tomorrow. Instead the Commission has decided to give the floor the
participants of the working group to present what they consider to be the
outcome.
The associations of European Press Publishers has been
so kind to circulate their conclusions in advance. The document provides a perfect
illustration of the failure to achieve any meaningful agreement between
stakeholders. In the end of the Licences for Europe process we have Press
Publishers agreeing with Press Publishers on things that are dear to Press
Publishers [that's
how also Merpel likes to conduct all her discussions]. Here are the 4 points of their presentation:
1. As a result of a year-long multi stakeholder
approach initiated by the European Commission, Press Publishers and Press Publishers
have agreed on principles for User Generated Content.
|
Polly and Milly agree that they both like strawberry ice cream, although they might eventually disagree on who should have the cherry |
2. Press Publishers are happy to allow ordinary people
to consume their content on many platforms and click on the share-and-like
buttons provided by the Press Publishers. They also allow ordinary people to
share links to their content on social media (this is in fact quite a
progressive stance if one keeps in mind that that these are the same people who
have brought the PRCA case to the CJEU [here]). Ordinary people must
never do anything commercial with the valuable professional content that is
made available by press publishers.
3. Press publishers are furthermore happy to take
anything that is made by ordinary people and integrate it into their
commercial offerings. They have even written up terms and conditions (at their
own expenses!) that ensure Press Publishers have the right to make
commercial uses such things.
4. Press Publishers stress the importance of promoting
education about intellectual property rights (IPRs) because it is widely known
that IPRs are important.”
Well, we'll see what happens
tomorrow. Further updates to follow, so: stay tuned!
That's about right. We will have the right to post links to web content owned by publishers, who consent to such linking. Rings a Svensson kind of bell too.
ReplyDelete