While
this Kat was busy in Hong Kong hosting an INTA Table Topic discussion on
battling online infringement, news emerged of progress in talks between UK ISPs
and rights owners on the development of a voluntary “four strikes” (but no “out”)
anti-piracy regime. There’s not much of definitive substance to report yet, but
here’s a heads up from my colleague Will
Corbett and me.
The VCAP's strikes will lack this sort of impact |
The scheme is being developed in parallel to the
regulations which will govern the operation of the UK’s Digital Economy Act
2010 (DEA), regulations which probably won’t appear until the end of next year
at the earliest.
The DEA followed an earlier failure by the ISPs and entertainment industry to
agree voluntary measures, but they are now back on the table.
The DEA was/is set to involve ISPs sending out
increasingly angry letters to subscribers who are caught indulging in peer to
peer file sharing, with repeat offenders going on a naughty list which rights
owners could peruse to choose the juiciest targets for follow-up litigation.
“Technical measures”, to include bandwidth throttling and temporary
disconnection, were envisaged as a next phase, but there is currently no
timetable at all for their appearance.
The voluntary measures under development are called the
Voluntary Copyright Alert Programme (VCAP), and if the BBC’s report is anything
to go by represent a step back from what the entertainment industry was
originally asking for. Letters would have told repeat infringers about possible
punitive measures and ISPs would have made available a database of known
illegal downloaders, opening the possibility of further legal action against
individuals. But what the BBC is reporting as the final draft of VCAP contains
neither of these things. The BBC reports that 'letters sent to suspected
infringers must be "educational" in tone, "promoting an increase
in awareness" of legal downloading services.' The language of each letter
will increase in “severity” but will “not contain threats or talk of
consequences for the accused users”. Up to four letters may be sent to
particular users, but after that ISPs will do precisely nothing. The
entertainment industry will also contribute up to £750,000 to each ISP to set
up the system and up to £75,000 a year to keep it running.
Piracy is everywhere |
On the entertainment industry side of the negotiations is
the BPI (representing the British music industry) and the Motion Picture
Association (MPA). Four of the UK’s five biggest ISPs are involved – BT,
Virgin, Sky and TalkTalk – while the fifth, EE, appears strangely absent.
The VCAP comes across as a bit of a damp squib, which is
something of an achievement given how disappointingly absent the DEA has been
the past four years. Of course, such a light touch system may be a stroke of
genius on the part of the entertainment industry. The BBC cites a commentator’s
speculation that the entertainment industry has agreed to this deal in order to
collect evidence that a voluntary approach simply cannot produce results,
thereby providing justification for pushing through stronger legislation-backed
measures under the DEA.
As ever, the IPKat and friends shall keep you
posted.
BPI, MPA and ISPs go VCAP against P2P while DEA is still MIA
Reviewed by Darren Meale
on
Friday, May 16, 2014
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html