Ahh, I thought this header might get your attention, it certainly caught mine when looking at today's offering of
German tabloid Bild, especially since I arrived at the website after clicking on a link including the reference: "delicate legal dispute relating to Gunter Sachs photograph".
What has happened? German media, serious broadsheets and tabloids alike (see
here,
here,
here and
here), are
reporting of a rather unusual dispute relating to the creative contribution of a
model, who had been depicted in a 1995 photo composition by the late eccentric
German and Swiss photographer, author,
industrialist, astrologer Gunter Sachs and former husband of Brigitte Bardot.
The photo can be found here.
The claimant in this dispute, which is pending at
Munich’s Higher Regional court, is
Munich based former model Kirsten Klie, ex
wife of a well-known photographer. The photograph in question, called “Ascot”, shows
beautiful Klie bare-chested (thus the unusually keen interest from
Germany’s
tabloids into what is basically a copyright dispute), in a mostly unbuttoned white
blouse, wearing a hat and binoculars.
The
photograph was successfully auctioned at Sotheby’s in 2012 for a net price of 204,691
Euro.
The defendants are representation
the estate of Mr Sachs and are the executors of his will.
They see things differently and would prefer
not pay.
Klie argues that she had “creatively advised” Sachs during
the photo shoot and that he acknowledged her co-creatorship and had
contractually granted her a 20% share in all profits made from “Ascot”. She also argues she creatively contributed to
the choice of outfits and accessories, suggested to use digital techniques on
the image and make it into a composition and collage style photograph, , etc. Indeed, Mr Sachs had paid her a 6,000 German
Marks share in profits (royalties) in 1997. He also included a personal note to her in a
2008 book he authored and which included the “Ascot”
photograph stating: “A little gift for a huge contribution”. “Ascot
will certainly provide us with the stardust, we hope for, in times to come”. Both parties also had a contractual agreement,
which had been drafted in rather medieval German by the eccentric Mr Sachs, but
which appears to have stated – albeit in a convoluted way – that Ms Klie was
meant to receive to receive royalties into the start of the next millennium.
The lower court, the Regional Court of Munich, had already
decided in favour of the claimant and against and awarded her about 41,000 Euro
earlier this year. They disagreed with the defendants that the contract was
only meant to last until the “turn of the millennium” and that Ms Klie had not
been creatively involved. On appeal by
the defendants the Higher Regional
Court now, according to news reports, suggests a settlement
of the dispute. A one off lump payment
of 100000 Euro for Ms Kies who in turn will no longer receive any further
royalties from a potential future commercialisation of the photo.
The defendants reportedly have two weeks
to decide whether they wish to accept: or as German tabloid
Bild has titled its report: "[Will the]
model now receive 100,000 Euros for her boobs?"
Sensationalism sells but I for one would have preferred / expected IPKat not to buy into such a boob of a headline and to adopt a more intelligent title and concluding line. It is meant to be funny I think but I found it quite distasteful especially, it has to be said, because the piece is written by a female IPKat...
ReplyDelete@anonymous of 11:58
ReplyDeleteThis is hardly a sensationalist headline: it's thoroughly and accurately descriptive.
Can it be seriously maintained that, in the year 2014, the appearance of the word 'boobs' as the 16th word in a headline is going to titillate (whoops, maybe I shouldn't that word) a readership of intellectual property practitioners, scholars, judges and administrators?
Why don't you have a competition for readers to suggest better headlines for this blog piece?
ReplyDeleteThe title is funny and clearly ironic, especially because it is female author and actually quite a prim one if you gave ever met Birgit. The title is also taking the mickeys out of tabloids and uber earnest commentators, such as the first one here!,
ReplyDeleteKnowing Birgit's previous attachment to Knut, I had expected that the model in question would be "bear" chested
ReplyDeleteSorry if I have offended anyone. I did indeed take the mickey out of the Bild, but my Germanic sense of humour clearly did not translate well.
ReplyDeleteOh dear and I still find it funny.