Tomorrow's Kat Chat: a reminder

Tomorrow afternoon, in a cosy corner of London' Holborn district, Christopher Rennie-Smith (formerly and again with Collyer Bristow, following a long spell at the European Patent Office) will be engaging in some constructive and indeed instructive discourse with IPKat team member and patent attorney Darren Smyth (EIP). Fellow Kat Jeremy will be in the chair.  To recap, the details of this event are recorded in full here, and the logistics are as follows:
  • Date: Thursday, 4 September 2014 
  • Venue: Collyer Bristow, 4 Bedford Row, London WC1R 4TF, United Kingdom 
  • Order of ceremonies: registration from 5 pm; welcome and intro 5.20 pm; Discussion followed by questions and answers 5.30 pm; refreshments 6.45 pm 
  • What does it cost? Nothing! Like all IPKat events, it's free
We've received news of some late cancellations [thanks for letting us know, says Merpel], which means that we now have some more spaces to spare.  If you'd like to attend, it's easy enough to do so.  To register, just email the IPKat at with the subject line "Kat Chat". The IPKat will confirm your place when he has the chance to do so.
Tomorrow's Kat Chat: a reminder Tomorrow's Kat Chat: a reminder Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, September 03, 2014 Rating: 5


  1. Will there be an video for posterity and those of us unable to attend?

  2. Sadly, no chance of streaming -- but a report will appear on this weblog, if that's any consolation!


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.