The IPKat can now confirm that we have all the necessary ingredients for the IP Publishers and Editors Lunch 2014. We have a date, Tuesday 25 November, at 12.30 pm to 2.30 pm. We have a venue, this being the London offices of law firm Bircham Dyson Bell, round the corner from Birdcage Walk -- a clear conceptual magnet for those of the feline persuasion, though few if any birdcages are now seen in those sumptuous parts. Finally, we have a guest speaker, the ever-challenging Ashley Roughton (barrister, one of the General Editors of The Modern Law of Patents, published by LexisNexis and now in its third edition). This event is free to attend and offers a lovely opportunity to rub shoulders with other people who are part of the sequence of events that leads from things happening in the field of IP to those selfsame things being known and discussed.
In past years we have welcomed colleagues from various corners of the world. We do hope that this year will be no exception!
If you are involved in any aspect of intellectual property editing or publishing, whether in the traditional media or the social media, and you'd like to attend, please email the IPKat at theipkat@gmail.com and let him know.
In past years we have welcomed colleagues from various corners of the world. We do hope that this year will be no exception!
If you are involved in any aspect of intellectual property editing or publishing, whether in the traditional media or the social media, and you'd like to attend, please email the IPKat at theipkat@gmail.com and let him know.
IP Publishers and Editors Lunch 2014
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html