Photo by De la Colicaranica |
- A Brexit could compromise the UK’s access to, participation in and influence over the world’s IP systems. This would not be good for either UK or international IP, or for the role of the UK’s IP attorneys and IP users within the global IP system,
- Since the IP system supports and incentivises research, development and innovation in the UK, remaining in the EU should better benefit such activities and in turn their contribution to the UK economy,
- A Brexit is likely to have a detrimental effect on the current businesses of CIPA members and other IP professionals, and on their competitiveness, in particular in the European market,
- Since these businesses include significant service exports, their success also affects the UK’s export economy.
Publication - In other UP and European news, Katfriend Ingve Björn Stjerna has published a revised an extended version of The Parliamentary History of the European Unitary Patent, available in German and English. Comments and further details from the PatLit blog here.
----
Consultations - The UK Government has been busy this week, posting the outcomes of one consultation and three new ones. The government response to Proposal for changes in registered design fees has pretty images and confirms the government's plan to enact reduced fees for online design registrations and some other bits and bobs.
Ambitious cat has ambitions Photo by Falense |
-----
Events - Finally, a reminder of two upcoming events: "More Than Just a Game: Interactive Entertainment and Intellectual Property Law (second edition)" is at Queen Mary in London next Friday the 7th. The event is advertised by invitation-only, but you can e-mail the organisers. On the 13th of April, also at Queen Mary, is a public seminar hosted by CREATe and BLACA to discuss a paper asking, "Is There a EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice." Those interested in attending should click on the EventBrite link halfway down this page.
Friday Fantasies
Reviewed by Nicola Searle
on
Friday, March 25, 2016
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html