As
the January blues have seriously started to kick in, the IPKat is in search of
some excitement around the IP blogland. Stay warm and cozy, Kat friends!
IPKat doesn’t mind a duvet day! |
The 1709 Blog discusses the proposed Music Modernization Act in the U.S., directed to an overhaul of the system of royalty arrangements for
mechanical licenses. This piece of legislation proposes a mechanism, under
which digital services would fund a Mechanical Licensing Collective, and, in
turn, be granted blanket mechanical licences for interactive streaming or
digital downloads of musical works. Although paid for by the digital
services, the new collecting society would be run by music publishers and
(self-published) songwriters. The law would also change the way the
statutory boards and courts that regulate US collective licensing are
organised; the selection method for judges to rate courts; and the criteria
employed when setting rates that would be altered to reflect market realities.
JIPLP looks at the CJEU’s
decision in C-265/16, VCAST, which analyses the intersection of private copying and communication to the
public in the context of the cloud. The Court held that a service enabling private
individuals to receive free-to-air television content and directly record it onto
a personal cloud storage space was unlawful. Even though the Court did not
address the applicability of the private copying exception to cloud services in
general, it did not foreclose its application of this exception. The exception should arguably apply to copies made by individual
customers of the service in cases where the work
is lawfully made available or the cloud service is predominantly characterised
by the reproduction function.
Over at the Kluwer Patent Blog, the patent light shines onto the IP community’s request for governmental action to ensure continuity and certainty of IP law in the
context of Brexit and to prevent disruption both to IP providers and its users.
The document of the IP organisations, inter alia, seeks UK’s continued
intention to stay in the UPC and to abide by the terms of the UPCA, to retain
one of the sections of the Central Division in London, and to ensure continued
involvement of UK national judges and participation of legal professionals qualified
and based in the UK in all parts of the Court’s procedures.
IP Draughts reviews the process by which
this document was drafted and also comments on its substantive contents. It is anticipated that many more such communications
from the IP industry stakeholders are on the way, aiming to enlighten
governmental officials on the issues that Brexit raises for IP law and policy.
The IPKat snuggles in a trade mark blanket
to find some celebratory news from WIPO and EUIPO as announced on Marques.The ROMARIN, Madrid e-Alert and Madrid Realtime Status tools have all been
discontinued by WIPO as of the 1st of January 2018, leaving Madrid
Monitor the only tool for tracking the status of international trade mark
applications and registrations under the Madrid System. The first day of this
year also marks the effective date for the 11th edition of the Nice
Classification. EUIPO bids farewell to the good old fax as a method for filing
and renewing a EUTM.
Around the IP Blogs!
Reviewed by Ieva Giedrimaite
on
Wednesday, January 17, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html