 |
| Have you said 'trade mark event'? |
Are you looking for an afternoon devoted to discussing the most recent developments in the area of trade mark law?
Then save the date and register for the event that The IPKat and Simmons & Simmons are organising together.
Based on Darren Meale’s popular Retromark blog posts (Volume I and Volume II), the event will be held at Simmons & Simmons London offices near Moorgate on Wednesday 14 March.
We can now confirm the full agenda and part of the line-up, as follows:
Then save the date and register for the event that The IPKat and Simmons & Simmons are organising together.
Based on Darren Meale’s popular Retromark blog posts (Volume I and Volume II), the event will be held at Simmons & Simmons London offices near Moorgate on Wednesday 14 March.
We can now confirm the full agenda and part of the line-up, as follows:
14:00-14:30 – Registration
14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome
14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “The fragile state of relations between service providers and brand owners: life after the UK Supreme Court decision in Cartier v Sky”
14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome
14:40-15:40 – Panel 1 – “The fragile state of relations between service providers and brand owners: life after the UK Supreme Court decision in Cartier v Sky”
Moderator: Eleonora Rosati
(University of Southampton and JIPLP Co-Editor)
Confirmed Panellists: Catherine Palmer (Legal Director at Joseph), Mark Cruickshank (IP Legal Counsel at The Royal Bank of Scotland Group)
Confirmed Panellists: Catherine Palmer (Legal Director at Joseph), Mark Cruickshank (IP Legal Counsel at The Royal Bank of Scotland Group)
15:40-16:00 – The
future of trade marks (speaker: Darren Meale)
16:00-16:20 – Coffee/tea break
16:20-17:00 – Keynote address: a year in trade marks [TBC]
17:00-18:00 – Panel 2 – “The colour and the shape: a terrible year for non-traditional trade marks?”
16:00-16:20 – Coffee/tea break
16:20-17:00 – Keynote address: a year in trade marks [TBC]
17:00-18:00 – Panel 2 – “The colour and the shape: a terrible year for non-traditional trade marks?”
Moderator: Darren Meale (Partner at
Simmons & Simmons and Deputy District Judge of the IPEC)
Confirmed Panellists: Giovanni
Visintini (Trade Mark & Copyright Counsel at BP),
Amanda Michaels
(Barrister at Hogarth Chambers, Appointed Person and Deputy Enterprise Judge of
the IPEC)
18:00-19:30 – Drinks and
canapes
The
first panel will take an in-context look at the UK Supreme Court’s
decision in a case
due to be heard at the end of January.
The second panel will reflect on the recent decision involving colour marks and Red Bull, as well as various other developments in colour and shape trade marks.
You can register here, but hurry up because places are limited!
The second panel will reflect on the recent decision involving colour marks and Red Bull, as well as various other developments in colour and shape trade marks.
You can register here, but hurry up because places are limited!
Save the date - Retromark: A Review of the Year in Trade Marks
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, January 15, 2018
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, January 15, 2018
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Flat rates supported by clauses on universality of repertoire in contracts between CMOs and users are anti-competitive, says Spanish Competition Authority](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhpBg7o3d7DPzH4YqNz3DUV5J5_sS4P7X7ZznFNETyQlLe0gonaSi3eE_jdjHD_aIjbPKhgpvUrkg6tPprYQYdwDGiyuWIXty9BOUlc07wUVbjDxI1bHoVxZA0ZCC9HBPjLXQwUioBSd9e9n-Z3uCeJ9UUgEvtJHLo1AllR20HGJETFdKoovxLBMw/s72-c/images.png)
![[Guest post] Asking ourselves ‘Y’ – Are shape marks shaping complex products’ aftermarkets?](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhHwE0es_m0lzJpedp0KFtKOYBne_M3YPJ-qwQxiY_YMkHffLAAXkSW9F-pjQFKsy5kJJ-VWScQQkuEVb5-BxnDv10XIMAbYhvgzBSQadD1gdTiIjg9-Oj9Iekll-C3Ca9I76uI3Hh5nCI4QyLosLSNev9VzLq9lF1jM86ungheEDOBKLzGTbE3yw/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html