Your weekly update on the news and events upcoming in IP is here! Highlights this week include news of inclusivity in London, a reminder of the change in fees
at the UK IPO and a new data set to browse from the USPTO.
UK – London
Celebrate the Chinese New Year in style with IP & Me’s inaugural event on 26 February 2018, hosted by Baker McKenzie (near St Paul’s). IP & Me is an IP inclusive group, focusing on ethnic minorities in IP. Everyone is welcome at this free networking event. For further details and registration, see here.
Attentive IPKat readers will recall from our last events post that Kat Neil Wilkof will be giving a lecture at Kings College London (KCL) on 23 January 2018, on the topic of Changing commercial circumstances, IP and revenge of the common law. For further details, see here.
Kat Neil will also
be giving a lecture at University College London (UCL) on 25
January 2018, on the topic of Branding and co-branding: How
much do they really contribute to innovation? More information
and registration can be found here.
A chance to see a Kat in the fur!
This Kat is big on inclusivity |
Finally,
the Charted
Institute of Trademark Attorneys
(CITMA) program of events for the year can be found here.
Of
note, are the CITMA Intensive Training Seminar on IP contracts on
21 March,
the Spring Conference and Gala Dinner on 21-23 March,
a Designs & Copyright Seminar on 19 April and
the CITMA Christmas Lunch on 14 December.
Netherlands, TILT
- Call for papers
The Tilbury Institute for Law, Technology and Society (TILT) PhD
Colloquium on Regulating new technologies in uncertain times will
take place at Tilburg University on 14 June
2018.
To find further information on the topics that will be covered at the
colloquium and to submit an abstract see here.
The deadline for abstract submissions is 28
February 2018.
Poland - WIPO roving seminars
The WIPO roving seminar series continues in Poland this month, in Cracow on January 23, Gliwice on January 24 and Wroclaw on January 25. The seminars and workshops will be in English and Polish, with Polish translation for the English presentations. For further information and free registration see here.
UK IPO – change
in fees
The
UK IPO’s
new
patent fee schedule will come into force on 6 April
of this year. The UK government’s guidance on the fee changes can
be found here.
The
application, search and examination fee are all set to increase.
Renewal
fees increase from the year 12 renewal fee onward. According
to the UK IPO, reasons for the increase in fees include to
“[m]aintain a sustainable income on reasonable assumptions to
finance the IPO’s future activities”.
USPTO – new data set on office actions
USPTO – new data set on office actions
The
USPTO has released a new data set providing detailed information on
the
office
actions (non-final
rejections
and final
rejections)
that
it issues.
According to the USPTO Chief Data Strategist Thomas Beach, these data
have been brought to the public by “leveraging emerging
technologies such as big data and machine learning”. The
data set itself can be downloaded from the USPTO’s open data
platform here.
A
paper published by the USPTO analyzing the data can be read here.
See Tables 1 and 2 of the paper for facts on the distribution of
reasons for rejection in final and non-final office
actions. This Kat's initial browse of the data reveals such interesting facts as 12.4% of the USPTO's §101
subject eligibility rejections being based
on the Alice decision (although the significance of this, without merging the data with those on the type of subject matter in examined claims, is unclear...). The
USPTO has also updated its patent
examination data set to
include the prosecution information for the
most recent applications, as
sourced
from public
pair.
Author: Rose Hughes
Author: Rose Hughes
Monday Miscellany
Reviewed by Rose Hughes
on
Monday, January 15, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html